Crop top controversy! Was the Spirit Airlines flight attendant being too dramatic?

3
2598

Recently, an incident aboard a Spirit Airlines domestic flight from Los Angeles to New Orleans has sparked debates about dress codes and whether an airline’s enforcement of them went too far. Two Southern California women, Tara Kehidi and Teresa Araujo, claim they were removed from the flight for wearing crop tops, accusing the airline of singling them out and publicly embarrassing them.

Was the flight attendant too dramatic, or was this simply a case of enforcing airline policy?

The Incident

According to Kehidi and Araujo, the issue began when they removed their sweaters due to the heat inside the cabin, as the plane’s air conditioning wasn’t functioning before takeoff. They were both wearing crop tops, exposing a small portion of their midriffs. That’s when a male flight attendant allegedly approached them and aggressively demanded they put their sweaters back on.

Curious about the airline’s dress code policy, the women asked to see the rules prohibiting crop tops. No clear explanation was provided, but things escalated when another passenger, Carla Hager, took their side. Hager, who was also wearing a crop top under her sweater, questioned the inconsistency and decided to remove her sweater in solidarity. The flight attendant eventually removed all three women and Hager’s toddler from the flight without offering a refund.

Spirit Airlines’ Response

Spirit Airlines released a statement acknowledging their clothing standards, which passengers agree to when booking a flight. Their Contract of Carriage specifies that passengers can be asked to leave if they are “inadequately clothed” or if their attire is considered lewd, obscene, or offensive. The women dispute these claims, asserting that they were neither inappropriate nor offensive in their attire.

Spirit Airlines is investigating the situation and has been in contact with the affected passengers.

Was It Justified?

This incident raises the question: were the actions of the flight attendant reasonable, or were they overly dramatic? On one hand, Spirit Airlines does have a dress code, and flight attendants are within their rights to enforce it. However, it seems that in this case, the women were not in clear violation of the policy, as crop tops—unless explicitly deemed offensive—should not automatically fall under the category of “inappropriate.”

The flight attendant’s refusal to reconsider even after the women offered to put their sweaters back on suggests a lack of flexibility in handling the situation. Some might argue that such strict enforcement, especially given the discomfort caused by the lack of air conditioning, was unnecessary and escalated a minor issue into a major disruption.

Conclusion

Ultimately, whether the flight attendant was being too dramatic is a matter of perspective. Some will argue that rules are rules, while others will see this as a case of overreach by an airline employee. What’s clear is that incidents like these highlight the need for better communication and perhaps more leniency in interpreting dress codes—especially when the comfort of passengers is already compromised.

What do you think? Should airlines be stricter with dress codes, or should they prioritize passenger comfort and common sense in such situations?

3 COMMENTS

  1. I recently flight to and from Costa Rica and rode 4 different planes, and let me tell you, i have seen a lot of clothing that are much more flashier that a crop top.
    1. a crop top is a regular piece of clothing
    2. Define what is inappropriate clothing for transparency and objective judgement.
    3. The plane gets REALLY hot before departure.
    4. If you are going to ban somebody to get into the plane, do it before they cross the gate.
    5. I think this particular flight attendant was too strict or really having a bad day and these girls were the scape goat.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.