Bombardier Launches 100-Seat CRJ1000

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

Post Reply
User avatar
ElcoB
Posts: 677
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: West-Flanders(Belgium)

Bombardier Launches 100-Seat CRJ1000

Post by ElcoB »

Eight orders for the new aircraft have been placed by Air France subsidiary Brit Air, with options for eight more, worth about $371-million (U.S.) or $768-million when the options are exercised.

My Way Airlines of Italy has agreed to convert 15 of 19 CRJ900 orders to CRJ1000 orders, increasing the value of that contract to $857-million from $702-million.

Bombardier said an unnamed customer has also placed a firm order for 15 CRJ1000s, with a conditional order for 15 more, in a deal worth up to $1.5-billion.

The CRJ1000 is scheduled to enter service in the fourth quarter of 2009.
:arrow: PRESSE RELEASE
:arrow: Canadian Press

Image

User avatar
cageyjames
Posts: 514
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 00:00
Location: On Lease to PHL

Post by cageyjames »

Right...

Because the problem with the CRJ900 was that it wasn't long enough.

The consumers will love this airplane! :roll:

User avatar
TWA
Posts: 606
Joined: 04 Oct 2003, 00:00
Location: Thalahassee, FL -- Sint-Truiden, BE
Contact:

Post by TWA »

the ideal plane for SN's future shorthaul fleet

Charlie Roy
Posts: 523
Joined: 29 Aug 2006, 22:20
Location: Europa

Post by Charlie Roy »

TWA wrote:the ideal plane for SN's future shorthaul fleet
Looks very nice, and indeed interesting.
I think the 100 seater e190 beats it on maximum take off weight and range though...

But it depends I suppose on what an airline are looking for, and the price too among everything else.

I wonder will they try to get it certified for London City's steep approach?

User avatar
nwa757
Posts: 1103
Joined: 17 Jul 2003, 00:00
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin - USA
Contact:

Post by nwa757 »

cageyjames wrote:Right...

Because the problem with the CRJ900 was that it wasn't long enough.

The consumers will love this airplane! :roll:
Why would the customers dislike the fact that it is long? I can understand the width being an issue, but there is no reason why a customer would want the aircraft to be shorter.

It will still be shorter than a 737 or A320, so I don't understand the problem.
Onward and Upward...

User avatar
fokker_f27
Posts: 1812
Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 00:00
Location: Weerde, Zemst - Belgium

Post by fokker_f27 »

What, do they want to make this even longer? :roll: I think they'll run into trouble developing this. Is it even possible for the structure and engines to handle a stretch like this?
The most sexy girl in the sky: The Sud-Est Caravelle 12.

User avatar
earthman
Posts: 2221
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: AMS

Post by earthman »

DC-9 derivatives were stretched beyond any reasonable aesthetic limits, why not the CRJ?

User avatar
cageyjames
Posts: 514
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 00:00
Location: On Lease to PHL

Post by cageyjames »

nwa757 wrote:Why would the customers dislike the fact that it is long? I can understand the width being an issue, but there is no reason why a customer would want the aircraft to be shorter.
I'm joking somewhat. CRJ900 is generally the least favorite plane of most consumers due to its cramped size. Compared to the E-Jets, I can't imagine why anyone would go with it (other than price).
It will still be shorter than a 737 or A320, so I don't understand the problem.
True, but it is much smaller in diameter. Tall folks like me avoid the CRJ900 at all costs as it is.

Post Reply