
(Sorry if a topic about this already exist)
Moderator: Latest news team
... I agree... even if its kinda "souvenir"...blackbox wrote:It's about time Brussels Airport is going to demolish or renovate the old part of the airport because today, it looks like hell. When you arrive by car (or even by plane) at Brussels Airport it looks like some Eastern European airport during the Cold War!
Just look at the old part in the background, it's horrible!
It won't be demolished, as I believe it is a protected landmark. At this moment, there is little use renovating it, as BRU doesn't need the extra capacity.It's about time Brussels Airport is going to demolish or renovate the old part of the airport
Hey Carlcat !carlcat wrote:The main hall onto the old building is a gift from the USA at the expo of 58 . Since Its a gift it has to be kept as a memorial or historical building . The small part of the building was not a part of the whole concept , the rotonde is part . So it cannot be destroyed . As by ending the Belgian mandate of Biac , no actions have been taken to give it a new future . Now the aussies are there , they are looking to reuse it , as the project can exist the C pier can become a terminal for low cost carriers or ???? as they also want to give new life to the old building . I hope I could explain somthing about the matter .
To make space for parking stands for long haul cargo planes. This was asked by DHL, if I'm not mistaking.Why did they demolish the small pier ?
Just look at the old part in the background, it's horrible!
It won't be demolished, as I believe it is a protected landmark.
I'm not sure, but I heard onhere a while ago that only the old departure hall (where now continental etc still have their check-in) was a protected landmark. I never got a clear answer about the sattelite though, but I thought that it wasn't protected (yet).The main hall onto the old building is a gift from the USA at the expo of 58 . Since Its a gift it has to be kept as a memorial or historical building . The small part of the building was not a part of the whole concept , the rotonde is part .
Actually, the pier that is still standing today was the only one that was not part of the original 1958 building. The north and south fingers were part of it, and both have been demolished. The remaining pier is over a decade younger than the noth and south fingers.The small part of the building was not a part of the whole concept , the rotonde is part . So it cannot be destroyed .
I think its not only the part of the old departure hall which is still accessible (the USA check-ins) but also the hall where one arrived and departed from there, now used as Sky Hall http://www.gourmetinvent.be/NL/skyhall.html for catering purposes.Flybe wrote:I'm not sure, but I heard onhere a while ago that only the old departure hall (where now continental etc still have their check-in) was a protected landmark. I never got a clear answer about the sattelite though, but I thought that it wasn't protected (yet).
As I wrote in 1973, when they also expanded runway 25L.Bruspotter wrote:Hello
I agree that the 'main building' is a very old building, and I've always found it quite odd for some reason :s don't ask me how...:s
But I must disagree with telling that from the C-sattelite. The building was newly builded in the years 70 (end) or '80's I think?? It once was the prowd of BRU, the Sabena long-haul flights loaded there (DC-10 and B747).
I've always liked it a lot and in comparison to some other buildings at the airport I still find the C-sattelite is looking quite modern (at least if you would clean it a bit), with it's 'brown' windows.
Will miss it.
Best regards: Yannick