What's your opinion about United 93 - the movie ?

A forum to discuss all aviation items (not for latest aviation news and military aviation news)

Moderator: Latest news team

User avatar
Depretair
Posts: 317
Joined: 29 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: Brussels
Contact:

What's your opinion about United 93 - the movie ?

Post by Depretair »

Hello,

I just wanted to know your opinion about the "film" UNITED 93.
I have seen it and it's really well done. The reality is so crual. :cry:
Do you think that despite the sadness of this event, it's a "good" publicity for UA ?

Thanks for posting your answers ...

Cheers,

Olivier ;-)

b-west

Post by b-west »

I went to see it tonight. It's very intense... I was drenched in sweat after the movie, and the theater was very quiet afterwards. You know the sad ending, and this makes looking the passengers preparing and executing their attack all the more tragic and touching.

I don't know if this is good or bad advertising for United. Everybody knows what happened, so I don't think that this movie is gonna have such a big influence on Uniteds popularity...


and on a side note: right after take off they showed an Airbus A320 in stead of a Boeing 757

User avatar
YYZ727
Posts: 279
Joined: 03 Dec 2004, 00:00
Location: Maldegem, Belgium
Contact:

Post by YYZ727 »

I don't know if this is good or bad advertising for United. Everybody knows what happened, so I don't think that this movie is gonna have such a big influence on Uniteds popularity...



For heavens sake, this is not a movie about United airlines... A little more respect is due....[/quote]

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Post by SN30952 »

YYZ727 wrote:
I don't know if this is good or bad advertising for United. Everybody knows what happened, so I don't think that this movie is gonna have such a big influence on Uniteds popularity...
For heavens sake, this is not a movie about United airlines... A little more respect is due....
It had an impact alright. The 9/11 events had huge impact -don't read me wrong here, please.

Airline industry suffered a lot.

What Olivier is asking I think, is if the movie would have an impact on the airline's customer behaviour.
First there is the title: UNITED 93
It's United, not United Airlines
United as for union, all together. And the american dream to be an hero, America stands united behind its heroes.

And as Universal, the specialist of disaster movies, announces, it is the "story of the fourth"
We were used to Flight 93
The title says more: “United in Courage, Community and Commitment”.
Image

Americans will like to identify with that.
So Olivier, imho, the impact will be positive with the Americans, they will want to belong to the Community. What would I have done in their situation, is the question many Americans ask.

Outside US the impact will be different. I do not want to mention negative feelings that it will earn in some countries. And that aren't UA's clients. Neither is Greengrass* working for these markets.

Some will see the movie as a disaster movie in the series of that kind.

Conclusion: Impact on UA's potential client is positive if not neutral.


______________
Note * He is also the maker of: "The Theory of Flight"

User avatar
ehamspotter
Posts: 501
Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: Kessel(Belgium)

Post by ehamspotter »

Hello;

Actually i don't know wath to think about the movie, in Europe, Asia and maybe for some Americans too, i think it is quite "intresting", because the movie is SO realistic,
but for the families from the victims, now they probably already handle a few years with there losts, but maybe with this movie all the memories comes up again and it qiute painfull i think.

rgds:Jeroen

User avatar
Zorba
Posts: 1733
Joined: 04 Apr 2003, 00:00
Contact:

Post by Zorba »

ehamspotter wrote:Hello;

Actually i don't know wath to think about the movie, in Europe, Asia and maybe for some Americans too, i think it is quite "intresting", because the movie is SO realistic,
but for the families from the victims, now they probably already handle a few years with there losts, but maybe with this movie all the memories comes up again and it qiute painfull i think.
Some family members have participated to make the movie as realistic as possible. And if they don't want to see the movie then just don't go.

I'm planning to go watch it in the near future, looks like a good "movie" to me (except for the Airbus they showe like Depretair said :D)

User avatar
A318
Posts: 1721
Joined: 13 Aug 2003, 00:00
Location: Between here and there
Contact:

Post by A318 »

I will see it next week since I hear only hear good reviews about it.
Too bad the end will never change anymore.
This movie is the last chapter in lots of people own book of life.

Respect,

Erwin
A Whole Different Animal

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Post by SN30952 »

A318 wrote:Too bad the end will never change (anymore).
This movie is the last chapter in lots of people own book of life.
Respect, Erwin
That's a grave thought, Erwin.
Do you mean the last chapter in the heroes' life?
Or was the idea not to forget, as the movie's website shows? I'm more in for a permanent 'epilog', the end will never change, as you wrote, where people are not forgotten, even after "a last chapter".

User avatar
A318
Posts: 1721
Joined: 13 Aug 2003, 00:00
Location: Between here and there
Contact:

Post by A318 »

Well this movie was the last experience for those people on board of the plane.
So with this I ment the last chapter of their book of life.
They all went like heroes and will always be remembered like heroes.

Erwin
A Whole Different Animal

User avatar
Stepha380
Posts: 347
Joined: 19 Jun 2006, 00:00
Location: Boring English countryside
Contact:

Post by Stepha380 »

They all went like heroes and will always be remembered like heroes.
In my opinion Heroes have the choice, they didn't. Heroes had the choice to go to the French Indochina war or to choose to resist Nazis because there was no conscription for this... People onboard were just in the wrong place at the wrong moment and they did what they could to try to survive, and not to defend their ideas or their country, they were just as unlucky as the people who died in the Twin Towers.

Unhappy is the land that is in need of heroes. BERTOLT BRECHT

I know it is an aviation forum, I respect all points of view on these events and I don't try to convince you, just my 2 cents.

User avatar
Zenfookpower
Posts: 158
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 00:00
Location: The Great Lakes (USA)

Post by Zenfookpower »

Stepha380 wrote:
They all went like heroes and will always be remembered like heroes.
In my opinion Heroes have the choice, they didn't. Heroes had the choice to go to the French Indochina war or to choose to resist Nazis because there was no conscription for this... People onboard were just in the wrong place at the wrong moment and they did what they could to try to survive, and not to defend their ideas or their country, they were just as unlucky as the people who died in the Twin Towers.

Unhappy is the land that is in need of heroes. BERTOLT BRECHT

I know it is an aviation forum, I respect all points of view on these events and I don't try to convince you, just my 2 cents.

Their choice was to do nothing or to act... Doing nothing might have brought that plane to Washington DC, The Capitol, The White House..Who knows...Keep in mind they knew what had happened in NY and the Pentagon...

Rest assured those heroes where mostly US citizens who do have a different opinion of defending their country then what you depicted...

It seems that you haven't seen the movie or either didn't understood what kind of heroes they had on that flight...

User avatar
Stepha380
Posts: 347
Joined: 19 Jun 2006, 00:00
Location: Boring English countryside
Contact:

Post by Stepha380 »

Don't take everything for real in the movie, the events depicted are "as might be expected".
The most amazing is how an army that targets its missiles to North Korea when they play with toys are unable to send the closest and fastest military jets to have a look at airplanes that switched off their transponders.
There are so long (not) to take a decision in the movie it is depressive.

User avatar
TexasGuy
Posts: 669
Joined: 15 Apr 2006, 00:00
Location: Houston, Texas

Post by TexasGuy »

Stepha380 wrote:Don't take everything for real in the movie, the events depicted are "as might be expected".
The most amazing is how an army that targets its missiles to North Korea when they play with toys are unable to send the closest and fastest military jets to have a look at airplanes that switched off their transponders.
There are so long (not) to take a decision in the movie it is depressive.
Time to grow up.......
Theres nothing better than slow cooked fall off the bone BBQ, Texas style

JetB
Posts: 651
Joined: 25 Sep 2003, 00:00

Post by JetB »

For the people, the country, this great nation, God !.
United we stand..... and more blah blah blah.

Hollywood's way to make big $$$$$$$$$$$$.

Yes this sounds cruel but isnt that reality ?.

User avatar
Tommypilot
Posts: 374
Joined: 22 Mar 2003, 00:00
Location: Near Brussels
Contact:

Post by Tommypilot »

Stepha380 wrote:Don't take everything for real in the movie, the events depicted are "as might be expected".
The most amazing is how an army that targets its missiles to North Korea when they play with toys are unable to send the closest and fastest military jets to have a look at airplanes that switched off their transponders.
There are so long (not) to take a decision in the movie it is depressive.
Jup, I can agree here. Their invasion in Iraq was also not well prepared...
But this slightly off topic :offtopic:

I am going to see the movie too in the future, I hope its realistic.

About heroes...these times its kinda hard to tell who are heroes and who are not. Its too personal I think.
For me, personal, the heroes are the firemen who tried to do what they could with the tools they had. But that's just personal...
Being in a plane and knowing for sure that its gonna be your end...I think many aspects of life are playing through your head and the only thing the "heroes" thought of was to minimize the victims on the ground...like a good pilot should do also!

Have a nice weekend,

User avatar
ElcoB
Posts: 677
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: West-Flanders(Belgium)

Post by ElcoB »

I found a report from a electronics specialist :
When you make a cell phone call, the first thing that happens is that your cell phone needs to contact a transponder. Your cell phone has a max transmit power of five watts, three watts is actually the norm. If an aircraft is going five hundred miles an hour, your cell phone will not be able to 1. Contact a tower, 2. Tell the tower who you are, and who your provider is, 3. Tell the tower what mode it wants to communicate with, and 4. Establish that it is in a roaming area before it passes out of a five watt range. This procedure, called an electronic handshake, takes approximately 45 seconds for a cell phone to complete upon initial power up in a roaming area because neither the cell phone or cell transponder knows where that phone is and what mode it uses when it is turned on. At 500 miles an hour, the aircraft will travel three times the range of a cell phone's five watt transmitter before this handshaking can occur. Though it is sometimes possible to connect during takeoff and landing, under the situation that was claimed the calls were impossible
I have no experience using cell phones in a plane. Maybe some of you may heve. I wonder if the above statement makes sence?

User avatar
luchtzak
Posts: 11745
Joined: 18 Sep 2002, 00:00
Location: Hofstade, Zemst - Belgium
Contact:

Post by luchtzak »

ElcoB wrote:I have no experience using cell phones in a plane. Maybe some of you may heve. I wonder if the above statement makes sence?
Cell phones indeed don't work inside an aircraft flying above +-1000ft , but didn't the passengers use satellite phones?

User avatar
ElcoB
Posts: 677
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: West-Flanders(Belgium)

Post by ElcoB »

luchtzak wrote:...........
Cell phones indeed don't work inside an aircraft flying above +-1000ft , but didn't the passengers use satellite phones?
I didn't see the film yet, cannot answer this.....somebody?

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Post by SN30952 »

Stepha380 wrote:In my opinion Heroes have the choice, they didn't.... People onboard were just in the wrong place at the wrong moment and they did what they could to try to survive, and not to defend their ideas or their country, they were just as unlucky as the people who died in the Twin Towers.
You read my mind, Stepha380? Are you a mindreader?
I wrote: ...And the american dream to be an hero, America stands united behind its heroes.
No matter how. Sometimes heroes are made.

That is in the line of the kidnapped soldier. That's not a hero, that a bad soldier, maybe a coward. But he is made a hero, for a cause.

Real heroes are mothers who raise their childern to become decent adults, because heroes have or take a mission.

But one can act heroic, when she/he does not shun a life threatening situation. He could have fought as a lion, or they could have sat there o/b UA93 and let happen. Some do not ask to be a hero...

User avatar
TexasGuy
Posts: 669
Joined: 15 Apr 2006, 00:00
Location: Houston, Texas

Post by TexasGuy »

luchtzak wrote:
ElcoB wrote:I have no experience using cell phones in a plane. Maybe some of you may heve. I wonder if the above statement makes sence?
Cell phones indeed don't work inside an aircraft flying above +-1000ft , but didn't the passengers use satellite phones?
That is not true. Cell phones will be operable below 10,000 ft depending on location the aircraft is traveling over or near. In the case of flight 93, the aircraft spent it entire flight time in an area of the country thats east of the Mississippi River. For anyone not familiar with the USA, that is the most densly populated area of the country and has the greatest cell phone coverage. With that being the case, the signal should have been and was strong enough below 10,000ft to work. ;)
Theres nothing better than slow cooked fall off the bone BBQ, Texas style

Post Reply