Hello,
I just wanted to know your opinion about the "film" UNITED 93.
I have seen it and it's really well done. The reality is so crual.
Do you think that despite the sadness of this event, it's a "good" publicity for UA ?
Thanks for posting your answers ...
Cheers,
Olivier
What's your opinion about United 93 - the movie ?
Moderator: Latest news team
I went to see it tonight. It's very intense... I was drenched in sweat after the movie, and the theater was very quiet afterwards. You know the sad ending, and this makes looking the passengers preparing and executing their attack all the more tragic and touching.
I don't know if this is good or bad advertising for United. Everybody knows what happened, so I don't think that this movie is gonna have such a big influence on Uniteds popularity...
and on a side note: right after take off they showed an Airbus A320 in stead of a Boeing 757
I don't know if this is good or bad advertising for United. Everybody knows what happened, so I don't think that this movie is gonna have such a big influence on Uniteds popularity...
and on a side note: right after take off they showed an Airbus A320 in stead of a Boeing 757
It had an impact alright. The 9/11 events had huge impact -don't read me wrong here, please.YYZ727 wrote:For heavens sake, this is not a movie about United airlines... A little more respect is due....I don't know if this is good or bad advertising for United. Everybody knows what happened, so I don't think that this movie is gonna have such a big influence on Uniteds popularity...
Airline industry suffered a lot.
What Olivier is asking I think, is if the movie would have an impact on the airline's customer behaviour.
First there is the title: UNITED 93
It's United, not United Airlines
United as for union, all together. And the american dream to be an hero, America stands united behind its heroes.
And as Universal, the specialist of disaster movies, announces, it is the "story of the fourth"
We were used to Flight 93
The title says more: “United in Courage, Community and Commitment”.
Americans will like to identify with that.
So Olivier, imho, the impact will be positive with the Americans, they will want to belong to the Community. What would I have done in their situation, is the question many Americans ask.
Outside US the impact will be different. I do not want to mention negative feelings that it will earn in some countries. And that aren't UA's clients. Neither is Greengrass* working for these markets.
Some will see the movie as a disaster movie in the series of that kind.
Conclusion: Impact on UA's potential client is positive if not neutral.
______________
Note * He is also the maker of: "The Theory of Flight"
- ehamspotter
- Posts: 501
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 00:00
- Location: Kessel(Belgium)
Hello;
Actually i don't know wath to think about the movie, in Europe, Asia and maybe for some Americans too, i think it is quite "intresting", because the movie is SO realistic,
but for the families from the victims, now they probably already handle a few years with there losts, but maybe with this movie all the memories comes up again and it qiute painfull i think.
rgds:Jeroen
Actually i don't know wath to think about the movie, in Europe, Asia and maybe for some Americans too, i think it is quite "intresting", because the movie is SO realistic,
but for the families from the victims, now they probably already handle a few years with there losts, but maybe with this movie all the memories comes up again and it qiute painfull i think.
rgds:Jeroen
Some family members have participated to make the movie as realistic as possible. And if they don't want to see the movie then just don't go.ehamspotter wrote:Hello;
Actually i don't know wath to think about the movie, in Europe, Asia and maybe for some Americans too, i think it is quite "intresting", because the movie is SO realistic,
but for the families from the victims, now they probably already handle a few years with there losts, but maybe with this movie all the memories comes up again and it qiute painfull i think.
I'm planning to go watch it in the near future, looks like a good "movie" to me (except for the Airbus they showe like Depretair said )
That's a grave thought, Erwin.A318 wrote:Too bad the end will never change (anymore).
This movie is the last chapter in lots of people own book of life.
Respect, Erwin
Do you mean the last chapter in the heroes' life?
Or was the idea not to forget, as the movie's website shows? I'm more in for a permanent 'epilog', the end will never change, as you wrote, where people are not forgotten, even after "a last chapter".
In my opinion Heroes have the choice, they didn't. Heroes had the choice to go to the French Indochina war or to choose to resist Nazis because there was no conscription for this... People onboard were just in the wrong place at the wrong moment and they did what they could to try to survive, and not to defend their ideas or their country, they were just as unlucky as the people who died in the Twin Towers.They all went like heroes and will always be remembered like heroes.
Unhappy is the land that is in need of heroes. BERTOLT BRECHT
I know it is an aviation forum, I respect all points of view on these events and I don't try to convince you, just my 2 cents.
- Zenfookpower
- Posts: 158
- Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 00:00
- Location: The Great Lakes (USA)
Stepha380 wrote:In my opinion Heroes have the choice, they didn't. Heroes had the choice to go to the French Indochina war or to choose to resist Nazis because there was no conscription for this... People onboard were just in the wrong place at the wrong moment and they did what they could to try to survive, and not to defend their ideas or their country, they were just as unlucky as the people who died in the Twin Towers.They all went like heroes and will always be remembered like heroes.
Unhappy is the land that is in need of heroes. BERTOLT BRECHT
I know it is an aviation forum, I respect all points of view on these events and I don't try to convince you, just my 2 cents.
Their choice was to do nothing or to act... Doing nothing might have brought that plane to Washington DC, The Capitol, The White House..Who knows...Keep in mind they knew what had happened in NY and the Pentagon...
Rest assured those heroes where mostly US citizens who do have a different opinion of defending their country then what you depicted...
It seems that you haven't seen the movie or either didn't understood what kind of heroes they had on that flight...
Don't take everything for real in the movie, the events depicted are "as might be expected".
The most amazing is how an army that targets its missiles to North Korea when they play with toys are unable to send the closest and fastest military jets to have a look at airplanes that switched off their transponders.
There are so long (not) to take a decision in the movie it is depressive.
The most amazing is how an army that targets its missiles to North Korea when they play with toys are unable to send the closest and fastest military jets to have a look at airplanes that switched off their transponders.
There are so long (not) to take a decision in the movie it is depressive.
Time to grow up.......Stepha380 wrote:Don't take everything for real in the movie, the events depicted are "as might be expected".
The most amazing is how an army that targets its missiles to North Korea when they play with toys are unable to send the closest and fastest military jets to have a look at airplanes that switched off their transponders.
There are so long (not) to take a decision in the movie it is depressive.
Theres nothing better than slow cooked fall off the bone BBQ, Texas style
- Tommypilot
- Posts: 374
- Joined: 22 Mar 2003, 00:00
- Location: Near Brussels
- Contact:
Jup, I can agree here. Their invasion in Iraq was also not well prepared...Stepha380 wrote:Don't take everything for real in the movie, the events depicted are "as might be expected".
The most amazing is how an army that targets its missiles to North Korea when they play with toys are unable to send the closest and fastest military jets to have a look at airplanes that switched off their transponders.
There are so long (not) to take a decision in the movie it is depressive.
But this slightly off topic fftopic:
I am going to see the movie too in the future, I hope its realistic.
About heroes...these times its kinda hard to tell who are heroes and who are not. Its too personal I think.
For me, personal, the heroes are the firemen who tried to do what they could with the tools they had. But that's just personal...
Being in a plane and knowing for sure that its gonna be your end...I think many aspects of life are playing through your head and the only thing the "heroes" thought of was to minimize the victims on the ground...like a good pilot should do also!
Have a nice weekend,
I found a report from a electronics specialist :
I have no experience using cell phones in a plane. Maybe some of you may heve. I wonder if the above statement makes sence?When you make a cell phone call, the first thing that happens is that your cell phone needs to contact a transponder. Your cell phone has a max transmit power of five watts, three watts is actually the norm. If an aircraft is going five hundred miles an hour, your cell phone will not be able to 1. Contact a tower, 2. Tell the tower who you are, and who your provider is, 3. Tell the tower what mode it wants to communicate with, and 4. Establish that it is in a roaming area before it passes out of a five watt range. This procedure, called an electronic handshake, takes approximately 45 seconds for a cell phone to complete upon initial power up in a roaming area because neither the cell phone or cell transponder knows where that phone is and what mode it uses when it is turned on. At 500 miles an hour, the aircraft will travel three times the range of a cell phone's five watt transmitter before this handshaking can occur. Though it is sometimes possible to connect during takeoff and landing, under the situation that was claimed the calls were impossible
You read my mind, Stepha380? Are you a mindreader?Stepha380 wrote:In my opinion Heroes have the choice, they didn't.... People onboard were just in the wrong place at the wrong moment and they did what they could to try to survive, and not to defend their ideas or their country, they were just as unlucky as the people who died in the Twin Towers.
I wrote: ...And the american dream to be an hero, America stands united behind its heroes.
No matter how. Sometimes heroes are made.
That is in the line of the kidnapped soldier. That's not a hero, that a bad soldier, maybe a coward. But he is made a hero, for a cause.
Real heroes are mothers who raise their childern to become decent adults, because heroes have or take a mission.
But one can act heroic, when she/he does not shun a life threatening situation. He could have fought as a lion, or they could have sat there o/b UA93 and let happen. Some do not ask to be a hero...
That is not true. Cell phones will be operable below 10,000 ft depending on location the aircraft is traveling over or near. In the case of flight 93, the aircraft spent it entire flight time in an area of the country thats east of the Mississippi River. For anyone not familiar with the USA, that is the most densly populated area of the country and has the greatest cell phone coverage. With that being the case, the signal should have been and was strong enough below 10,000ft to work.luchtzak wrote:Cell phones indeed don't work inside an aircraft flying above +-1000ft , but didn't the passengers use satellite phones?ElcoB wrote:I have no experience using cell phones in a plane. Maybe some of you may heve. I wonder if the above statement makes sence?
Theres nothing better than slow cooked fall off the bone BBQ, Texas style