Atlantis wrote:
And still there is some potential in every segment.
* North America can still grow with some extra frequencies on existing destinations and some new.
I'm still awaiting the much announced second EWR rotation by CO, they seem to be 'testing' IAH via EWR as well, so there might be something in the pipeline, too.
BOS is still expected, maybe by SN itself, and maybe there is some potential for one Westcoast city as well... I know these flights are hard to start up and maintain, but we don't know how the market will develop in a few years... But it is an advantage UA has a hub at both major Westcoast airports LAX and SFO.
Now, many will tell I'm crazy, but a seasonal flight to MIA could be possible as well, but then I think it will be by a leisure company. Maybe in combination with LAS? These cities don't have the potentional to be served from BRU year-round, but I do see a market in the high season? How dit JAF perform on their Orlando flights?
* Africa is off course the continent of SN but it is still possible that a real African carrier can start up a new destination to BRU like f.e. Arik Air.
Maybe yes, but I guess the focus of BRU at Africa will stay with SN. SA could be an option as well?
* Asia will also grow with some new destinations and carrier(s)
I still believe this is the second grow market from BRU. The fact that Jet Airways established a hub at BRU has a big influence on Asia flights of course, but it remains uncertain what 9W will do alliance wise and what influence it will have at BRU. If 9W would go to Star Alliance, it could mean a real boost to BRU. Other companies: ANA, Thai and Singapore. Those are some of the airlines BRU should really try to attract.
* leisure long haul: this is a difficult one. We have one leisure carrier with their own 2 long haul aircraft. But they are also used on popular medium long haul destinations.
Thomas Cook Airlines is using XL Airways for their flights to Zanzibar/Mombasa, Phuket flights
This is a real diffucult one.
I recently heard JAF is going to use the 787 as an extra plane and keep both 767's... If true, I guess they will solely deploy the 787 for long haul and alternate the 767's between medium and long haul.