From your comment I can only assume you have no experience in subchartering aircraft, and certainly not for long haul operations. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Don't you think that JAF would have preferred double Martinair crew. It costs substantially less to operate a double crew then to accomodate the hundreds of pax + crew at outstation. Plus, you'll get the aircraft in BRU again earlier to be able to operate a second flight next day due to the prolonged AOG. (let's say a TLV)LX-LGX wrote:The Martinair 767 left for Varadero on Saturday evening, so it could have been back in BRU already on Sunday evening - or at the latest on Monday noon. But then indeed, I was wrong, I'm sorry: I was wrongly thinking that JAF would try to get the pax back home as soon as possible, even it that would mean a double Martinair crew.JAFflyer wrote:Negative, the Martinair did in fact fly the passengers back. Odd conclusion you make out of that story...LX-LGX wrote:So after all, it seems that did not sent a Martinair 767 to Varadero/Cancun, but just waited till OO-TUC was fixed.
Anyway : trust the pax preferrred PH-MCG above OO-TUC for their return flight, don't you think so?
But unfortunately that's not always possible due to:
1) company duty limitations. Each company has different duty limitations and operation manuals. 30 hours crew rest is not exceptional. This is mainly the result of unions having something to say in some companies.
2) pax load too high to be able to seat a double crew. You won't leave pax behind to be able to get the others home faster.
And might I add, that your statement concerning the state of OOTUC is really irrelevant. It's about the first time last week it has been AOG in over 4 months. You have no info concerning the technical status (I do) of this aircraft so please don't assume it is a lousy aircraft. Because if you do that, you're no better than some ignorant news reporter.
Sorry but it was about time someone pointed that out.