Jet Airways rumours
Moderator: Latest news team
-
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: 23 Jun 2007, 20:51
- Location: BRU
I thought it was the other way around: the terminal protected, but not the satelite...K_R wrote:As far as I am always told, only the satelite is a protected monument. I'm not sure, but I think even the bridges can't be broken down. Of course, this makes it ideal for low coast carriers, who don't use bridges anyway. About these bridges, I have walked true one recently. The last part of them, which connects to the planes, really gave me a Star Wars feeling
The old terminalbuilding is not protected. The major problem is that this building is full of asbest and by that reason very expensive to renovate. The BAC will only commence on renovating it if they are certain they will profit of it, so adding a special JA-concourse and a low cost concourse will do the job, I guess.
The old terminalbuilding is, honestly, ugly and dirtiy, it gives me a Eastern Europe feeling.
Kind regards,
Stij
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 01 Apr 2006, 00:00
Apparently, JET is doing very well - and wants to double its 1 mio pax/year target at BRU... Have a look at the link (Dutch only)
http://www.standaard.be/Artikel/Detail. ... 102007_028
http://www.standaard.be/Artikel/Detail. ... 102007_028