Brussels Airlines adventure in Africa

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

Post Reply
User avatar
tolipanebas
Posts: 2442
Joined: 12 May 2004, 00:00

Post by tolipanebas »

Atlantis wrote:Tolipanebas is right.
Thank you.
Atlantis wrote:They want to serve more African destinations non-stop. What kind of aircraft could they use for that purpose? A319?
SN is silently looking for a 5th A330-300, but don't expect one arriving before early next year and the aim is to operate daily to the region of the great lakes with it to connect to the network of the New African company....

Boeing767copilot
Posts: 1386
Joined: 13 May 2004, 00:00

Post by Boeing767copilot »

I read something about the name of new company for the Africa operations: Pan African Airways. Can somebody comfirm this?

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

60 Next-Generation 737s, standby....

Post by SN30952 »

Atlantis wrote:But they want to serve more African destinations non-stop. What kind of aircraft could they use for that purpose? A319?
A rethorical question? Atlantis.
The answer, I suppose, is singaporian aircraft.
Q1 :?:
What as the last singaporian order?
Q2 :?:
What order did SALE* place exactly one year ago?
10 Boeing Next-Generation 737s, plus 10 options and 10 purchase rights.
Btw, in May 2005 SALE ordered already 20 such airplanes.
*Singapore Aircraft Leasing Enterprise (SALE)
10+10+10+20
What is the SIN-BRU about? Fleets indeed.
What aircraft will be shifted to the MRU financial base, that is indeed the question.

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Post by SN30952 »

Boeing767copilot wrote:I read something about the name of new company for the Africa operations: Pan African Airways. Can somebody comfirm this?
Pan African Airways is based in Nigeria.
Code PF
Give them a call?
Pan African Airlines Ltd.
Old Domestic Wing M/M Airport
PO Box 21054
Ikeja, Lagos Nigeria
+ 234 1 4963601

Sometimes mentioned as Airline, somtimes as Airways
Image

teach
Posts: 740
Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 00:00

Post by teach »

If SN's BAe 146s are to be shifted to the African operation, as seems to be the plan, what will replace them in Europe? More Avros?

User avatar
Airbus330lover
Posts: 883
Joined: 21 Jul 2005, 00:00
Location: Rixensart

Re: 60 Next-Generation 737s, standby....

Post by Airbus330lover »

SN30952 wrote:
Atlantis wrote:But they want to serve more African destinations non-stop. What kind of aircraft could they use for that purpose? A319?
A rethorical question? Atlantis.
The answer, I suppose, is singaporian aircraft.
Q1 :?:
What as the last singaporian order?
Q2 :?:
What order did SALE* place exactly one year ago?
10 Boeing Next-Generation 737s, plus 10 options and 10 purchase rights.
Btw, in May 2005 SALE ordered already 20 such airplanes.
*Singapore Aircraft Leasing Enterprise (SALE)
10+10+10+20
What is the SIN-BRU about? Fleets indeed.
What aircraft will be shifted to the MRU financial base, that is indeed the question.
Are you dreaming?

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Re: 60 Next-Generation 737s, standby....

Post by SN30952 »

Airbus330lover wrote:10 Boeing Next-Generation 737s, plus 10 options and 10 purchase rights.
Are you dreaming?
10 Boeing Next-Generation 737s, plus 10 options and 10 purchase rights.
Boeing must be dreaming?

fcw
Posts: 769
Joined: 01 Nov 2006, 23:20

Post by fcw »

teach wrote:If SN's BAe 146s are to be shifted to the African operation, as seems to be the plan, what will replace them in Europe? More Avros?
Nothing will replace them! BruAir is loosing money on almost all of its european routes. The plan for axing the 6 old Bae146 exits for a long time, now they are going to use them to create small hubs in EBB, KGL, BJM, ...

User avatar
Established02
Posts: 1625
Joined: 16 Oct 2002, 00:00

Post by Established02 »

fcw wrote:
teach wrote:If SN's BAe 146s are to be shifted to the African operation, as seems to be the plan, what will replace them in Europe? More Avros?
Nothing will replace them!
Hmmm... really? 6 aircraft do generate a lot of production. Taking these 146's out without replacing them would result in putting the axe on multiple destinations. Which ones would you put on death row?

FLY4HOURS.BE
Posts: 454
Joined: 01 May 2007, 22:13
Location: Antwerp, Belgium

Post by FLY4HOURS.BE »

Maybe SN will move its whole operational HQ from Brussels to Mauritius on a long-term?
They can keep the name and the regs here and pay taxes there.

Interesting times thanks to our hope-giving national carrier!!
Fly4hours, making the path to airline pilot affordable to all

FLY4HOURS.BE
Posts: 454
Joined: 01 May 2007, 22:13
Location: Antwerp, Belgium

Post by FLY4HOURS.BE »

And I think that putting the Avro's in Africa is a wise choice.

Avro's are expensive aircraft to operate and are mainly specialised for STOL operation, not for the big luxurious RWY's we have here in Europe.

Moreover, the high operational costs they have here in Europe are mainly generated by the highly taxed fuel prices, which are alot lower in Africa.

About their replacement here in BRU?
Well, wasn't there any rumors about the SSJ(Sukhoi Super Jet) some time around?

Greets
Fly4hours, making the path to airline pilot affordable to all

Stij
Posts: 2273
Joined: 07 Mar 2005, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Stij »

Maybe a stupid question, but when you base your company in Mauritus, is your company entitled to traffic rights between Rwanda and Kenya for instance. I mean, do Mauritian Airliners have 7th freedom rights between third party African countries?

Cheers,

Stij

fcw
Posts: 769
Joined: 01 Nov 2006, 23:20

Post by fcw »

FLY4HOURS.BE wrote:Maybe SN will move its whole operational HQ from Brussels to Mauritius on a long-term?
They can keep the name and the regs here and pay taxes there.

Interesting times thanks to our hope-giving national carrier!!
Keep on dreaming, one office or regs in belgium means tax in Belgium!

fcw
Posts: 769
Joined: 01 Nov 2006, 23:20

Post by fcw »

FLY4HOURS.BE wrote:And I think that putting the Avro's in Africa is a wise choice.

Moreover, the high operational costs they have here in Europe are mainly generated by the highly taxed fuel prices, which are alot lower in Africa.

Greets
How do you explain that some of the A330 take max fuel in BRU to fuel less in Africa?

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 40841
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Post by sn26567 »

fcw wrote:How do you explain that some of the A330 take max fuel in BRU to fuel less in Africa?
Indeed aviation fuel is tax-free in most Euroepan countries (at least for international flights) and less costly to produce than in Africa.
André
ex Sabena #26567

A390
Posts: 51
Joined: 04 Jun 2005, 00:00

Post by A390 »

Main reason to choose Mauritius for the headquarters is the political stability of this country. This enables reasonable insurance rates, avoids "state" interventions (....) unwanted in a commercial environment and gives confidence to aircraft lessors. Just try to convince a lessor to put one of its aircraft on a central african countries' register: good luck!
JAR standards have little or nothing to do with this, as the new airline will just have to fulfill the standards set by the country where the AOC is . However it could give the passengers a reassurance as to minimum safety standards.

spotter1102

Post by spotter1102 »

I think Brussels Airlines should keep their A319 in BRU and send in Mauritius some 737s

kglapt
Posts: 5
Joined: 26 Feb 2006, 00:00

Post by kglapt »

SN needs to wake up!!! :( !!! The BAe will never make money for them in East Africa. First and foremost, the region is highly competitive due to the modern fleet of KQ, ET and SAA. Therefore passengers have to choose between the BAEs and B737NG(ET,KQ) and A319s (SAA). Secondly, We Africans like to carry lots of luggage hence most airlines in Africa will allow 35-40kgs of free luggage, not to mention the amount of cargo that is moved within the East Africa. By the way Rwanda and Burundi are now considered as part and parcel of East Africa.
Thirdly, the established carriers in the region (KQ,ET and SAA) are already serving ALL the available routes properly, so what new routes will SN operate? KGL-NBO, KGL-BJM, KGL-ADDIS,EBB-ADDIS, EBB-NBO, BJM-NBO are already saturated!!! KQ and ET serve these routes on a daily (or more) basis!!

In my view, The Rwanda Govt will NOT accept a proposal from SN until they change their offer from BAEs to a bigger AC.eg B737-300, A320,A319 etc.
Our country is landlocked, the only way to move goods is by roads through Uganda and into Kenya or by air. Hence Air is the more preferred mode of transport. The government knows that and SN needs to also realise that the reason why their offer was not accepted at first was because of the BAEs.

All the same, I hope SN management wakes up soon before MERIDIANA tables a better proposal for Rwandair.

User avatar
tolipanebas
Posts: 2442
Joined: 12 May 2004, 00:00

Post by tolipanebas »

kglapt wrote:The Rwanda Govt will NOT accept a proposal from SN until they change their offer from BAEs to a bigger AC.eg B737-300, A320,A319 etc.
Who says it Sn is still aiming purely at Rwanda???

Last thing I've heard was that Burundi is very acceptable to the proposals of SN too and is extremely cooperative when it comes to giving the project all possible collaboration.

After all: they have come to understand it is far better to have a small but decently run home carrier, than no carrier at all like the Rwandeese are risking...

Let's draw the lines CLEARLY for once and for all:

the project SN is planning on consist of relocating a small number of BAe146s to an airport in East Africa to set up a local hub overthere, preferably with the collaboration of the domestic (defunct) 'national' carrier and to serve the hub daily from BRU with A330.

It really is a take it or leave it offer, meaning the country of choice needn't try to change the original project into something bigger, costlier etc as SN will NOT change its plan nor the envisaged fleet composition (as Camair has learned the hard way....).

The plan might be of limited impact indeed, but it is a clear-cut and feasable plan which is ready to be implemented within a few months if a host nation is found and has a high degree of success due to the daily feeder from BRU.

Rwandeese should stop dreaming: they are a poor country, with no airline of their own and they now have the chance to get one for almost free... Better than ask for a bigger and newer fleet, why not work hard so the new carrier can soon outgrow its small fleet of regional jets and be forced to buy new and bigger planes... Remember that in a market driven airline, fleet decisions are based on actual needs, NOT prestige.

Burundi seems to have understood it.... :wink:

blackbox
Posts: 47
Joined: 06 Nov 2006, 11:47
Location: Flanders, Belgium

Post by blackbox »

Let's face it: the fleet is a weak point of SN. I know people avoiding SN because they don't want to end up in thos BAEs/Avro's...

Post Reply