Thai Airlines to sell off new A340's

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

User avatar
cageyjames
Posts: 514
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 00:00
Location: On Lease to PHL

Post by cageyjames »

PlaneHunter wrote:US' longhaul product is quite average or even slightly below (e.g. old B762 cabin), but there's no reason to compare it to FR.
I guess you haven't seen the new advertisements on the First Class trays yet have ya?
US Airways - Fly with US

User avatar
ryanCX
Posts: 141
Joined: 20 Nov 2005, 00:00
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by ryanCX »

A345 campared to 777LR is less efficient- agreed. But it just isn't a good enough excuse to blame A345 for THAI's losses. Like someone mentioned earlier, Lufthansa, Virgin and Qatar Airways depend mostly on A340s for their long haul services and are making good profits.
It was probably never a good idea to even launch these ULH routes. Bangkok and Thailand still is majorly a tourist destination with most western ones coming from Europe. So, THAI probably wouldn't be able to sell expensive seats on these routes even with LRs as well as CX or SQ.

Best thing for THAI to do then is to restructure its network and focus on its profitable routes.

User avatar
CX
Posts: 788
Joined: 30 Jul 2005, 00:00

Post by CX »

ryanCX wrote:A345 campared to 777LR is less efficient- agreed. But it just isn't a good enough excuse to blame A345 for THAI's losses. Like someone mentioned earlier, Lufthansa, Virgin and Qatar Airways depend mostly on A340s for their long haul services and are making good profits.
It was probably never a good idea to even launch these ULH routes. Bangkok and Thailand still is majorly a tourist destination with most western ones coming from Europe. So, THAI probably wouldn't be able to sell expensive seats on these routes even with LRs as well as CX or SQ.

Best thing for THAI to do then is to restructure its network and focus on its profitable routes.
Cathay has been posting record profits, and their long haul planes are their 15 A343s, 3 A346s and the 747s.. i dont' think operating A340s makes an airline lose, but perhaps less profitable..

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Post by SN30952 »

ryanCX wrote:Best thing for THAI to do then is to restructure its network and focus on its profitable routes.
Can confirm that, ryanCX.

User avatar
ryanCX
Posts: 141
Joined: 20 Nov 2005, 00:00
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by ryanCX »

Thai decide to keep the US routes afterall

http://www.bangkokpost.com/topstories/t ... ?id=117685

regi
Posts: 5140
Joined: 02 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Bruges

Post by regi »

yes, but no news about the long range airbusses

User avatar
fleabyte
Posts: 237
Joined: 02 Dec 2005, 00:00
Location: Colorado and Colombia

bits 44 on the mark

Post by fleabyte »

The A340 has become a lemon.

User avatar
fleabyte
Posts: 237
Joined: 02 Dec 2005, 00:00
Location: Colorado and Colombia

A340 of Lufthansa

Post by fleabyte »

I would argue Lufthansa is making a profit on A340 routes beacsue they are a very efficient and competent airline. If they had 777-300ER - those routes would have to be more profitable - considering they would be lugging around 40,000 lbs less every flight.

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Re: A340 of Lufthansa

Post by SN30952 »

fleabyte wrote:I would argue Lufthansa is making a profit on A340 routes beacsue they are a very efficient and competent airline. If they had 777-300ER - those routes would have to be more profitable - considering they would be lugging around 40,000 lbs less every flight.
And so do Turkish Airlines and Virgin, too. And I can cite quite some more companies who making a profit on A340 routes.
On the other hand I cannot believe TG makes profit on BKK-CNX B777-routes. Using the right tool for the right job is a basic rule for good work and eventual profit, and the A340 is a tractor for well defined routes.

A340-200 Typical passenger seating 239 Bulk hold volume - Standard/option 19.7 / 13.76 m3
A340-300 Typical passenger seating 295 Bulk hold volume - Standard/option 19.7 / 13.76 m3
A340-500 Typical passenger seating 313 (3-class) Bulk hold volume - Standard/option 19.7 / 13.76 m3
A340-600 Typical passenger seating 380 Bulk hold volume - Standard/option 19.7 / 13.76 m3
Compare that to
A330-200 Typical passenger seating 253 (3-class) 293 (2-class) Bulk hold volume - Standard/option 19.7 / 13.76 m3
A330-300 Typical passenger seating 295 (3-class) 335 (2-class) Bulk hold volume - Standard/option 19.7 / 13.76 m3

The more passengers load, the longer the flights results in less cargo...

website-info
Posts: 750
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 00:00

Post by website-info »

Guys,

the rumour is that these 4 A340's are heading to South African who in turn will sell 4 RR powered B744 to BA (thats teh real BA before anyone asks :)

T

User avatar
PYX
Posts: 183
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 00:00

Post by PYX »

I believe, but could be wrong, that the 340s Thai Air was using for their non-stop flights to and from the U.S. were configured for approximately 250 passengers.

User avatar
ryanCX
Posts: 141
Joined: 20 Nov 2005, 00:00
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by ryanCX »

If THAI is to continue with the direct american flights, it is most probable they will stick with the A340s. Blaming the aircrafts may have just been a lame excuse for the poor performance by the airline.
They very well could operate B777-200ERs though, if they are indeed keen on chucking the A340s.

Post Reply