sn26567 wrote:Atlantis wrote:That's an increase of 1.9% when you compare this with the same month last year.
Macquarie had more ambition than a meager 1.9%. This growth rate is also lower than the neighbouring airports. Brussels Airport (as it is now proudly called) is losing ground. A strong innovative management is badly needed!
You have to be carefull when you are saying that. For this year the average growth was between 1.5 and 1.9%. That's not much indeed but you have to look what you have got for that figure. This year, three new long hauls landed at BRU: Etihad, Ethiopian and Hainan. Etihad had a 72% loadfactor, Hainan 50% or more and I have no figures about Ethiopian.
What about the based carriers: SNBA opened FRA and add some extra flights on some routes. So, you can't expect a growth of 18% like some in their portfolio or when you compare with our neighbours.
You have to see the whole picture. In two years the airport received 1 million pax more, so I don't call it that Brussels airport is losing ground.
I would say that BRU is going in the right direction. There is a confirmation for next year that Jet Airways, daily B777 and Northwest, B757 are coming to BRU. BIAC is talking to have a connection with Japan and South Africa. So maybe we can expect those carriers in a year or two.
I think its better to start with a very strong base then attracting carriers who stopped their service after a month. Then you reached nothing.
I think and hope that Brussels Airport has a clear vision for pax and cargo (they have now a new Brucargo marketing manager to look for new cargo carriers) for the future.