My aunt went to Las Palmas in June 2003 with SLRs 737-800 OO-VAs and I went there in august this year. We flew with the Thomas Cook OO-TCB
We made a stop at FUE, mu aunt didn't.
RWY take-off at BRU : both cases 25R
SID: Chievres 6 C ( SLR ) Chievres 6 D ( TCB )
Zero fuel weight: 59.9tons ( SLR ) 59 tons ( TCB )
TOW: 74.2 tons( SLR ) 73 tons ( TCB )
Fuel on board: 14.3 tons ( SLR ) 14 tons ( TCB )
V1: 157 kt ( SLR ) 153kt (TCB )
Vr: 160 kt (SLR ) 153kt (TCB )
V2: 164kt (SLR ) 155kt ( TCB )
FL: both 370(00 feet )
IAS: both 253 kt
TAS: both 450kt
GS: 436kt ( SLR ) 473kt (TCB)
Mach: both 0.78
Wind: 146°/37kt ( SLR ) 337°/51kt ( TCB )
EGT: 663/666°C ( SLR ) 472/476°C ( TCB )
Fuel flow: 1270/1250kgs/hr(SLR ) 1320/1350kgs/hr ( TCB )
Cabin altitude: 7500feet(SLR) 7400feet (TCB)
RWY landing at LPA : both 03L
Landing weight: 63.2tons (SLR ) 62tons ( TCB )
Vref: 145kt (SLR ) 133kt (TCB )
So SLR used 11 tons fuel, TCB used 11tons ( even with a stop in FUE )
The A320 used a little bit more per hour, EGT was lower.
The 737-800 take-off and landing speeds are higher then the A320s
I got this info by simply giving the FA a paper where the crew just had to fill in their readings.
I was funny to see the face of the FA when she asked "what does this all mean?" 8O I told here" It's okay as long as the pilots know what it means"
