sean1982 wrote: Indeed, SN is not much more than an empty box with a lot of debt and not many assets. None of their aircraft are in ownership now as far as I know. Their operational result/brand is the only real asset but 40m€ profit at an all time low fuel price, there is not many threats to make. (And btw, few of you seem to forget that denying LH the shared aint an option. They have to contractual right to do so)
Let me disagree ...
SN is a more wealthy airline than you think ... bcs they are a FULL star alliance member.
This is worth value IMHO ..
There are not so many star hubs on the planet ...
And there are not so many carriers that are full STAR members.
Care to enumarate them with me ?
Star hubs :
sfo,iah,ord,ewr,iad,yvr(small),yyz,yul,bog,cai,jnb,add,del,bom(partially),pek,pvg,szx(small), icn(partially), nrt(partially), bkk,sin,ist.
And in Europe: fra,muc,zrh,vie,cph,arn(small),waw(small),.. and bru.
Star carriers are the one operating from the hubs. Not so many arund ...
This means MONEY... Sn HAS value ! Much more than you imagine ...
Ei just being taken over by the ba group will soon benefit from a full 1world membership. Be sure their future is bright.
LH dumping sn as a star carrier and bru as a star hub would NOT make a bright future for B. airline business ....
Let's hope I misundersood something and that LH will care for the important and valuable Bru star hub.