747ADV Officially launched!

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

Mordoch
Posts: 12
Joined: 13 Jul 2005, 00:00

747ADV Officially launched!

Post by Mordoch »

The Boeing Company today officially launched the new Boeing 747-8 program, which includes the 747-8 Intercontinental passenger airplane and the 747-8 Freighter airplane.

Cargolux, based in Luxembourg, has ordered 10 747-8 Freighters and will take delivery of the first 747-8F in third-quarter 2009. It also holds purchase rights for 10 additional airplanes. Cargolux currently operates an all-Boeing fleet of 13 747-400 freighters.

Nippon Cargo Airlines, based in Japan, has ordered eight 747-8 Freighters and will receive its first airplane in fourth-quarter 2009. The airline also acquired options for six additional airplanes. Nippon Cargo currently operates 13 747 freighters and has six more 747-400Fs on order.

Firm orders from the two launch customers are valued at approximately $5 billion at list prices.

Read more here: https://www.aviation24.be/article10547.html

Congratulations to Boeing!

chornedsnorkack
Posts: 428
Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:00

Cross-section

Post by chornedsnorkack »

The 747 has been weirdly shrunk, see

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747fam ... sheet.html
Seating:
450 passengers in a three-class configuration

Range:
14,815 km (8,000 nmi) (Intercontinental)
8,275 km (4,475 nmi) (Freighter)

Configuration:
Twin aisle

Cross-section:
5.7 m (226 inches)

Wing span:
68.5 m (224 ft 9 in)

Length:
74.2 m (243 ft 6 in) (Intercontinental)
75.3 m (250 ft 2 in) (Freighter)

Height:
19.4 m (63 ft 6 in)

Thrust:
66,500 pounds (GEnx-2B67)

Cruise speed:
Mach 0.85

Maximum Takeoff Weight:
435,456 kg (960,000 pounds)
Note how the cross-section is much smaller than for versions 100-400!

User avatar
luchtzak
Posts: 11738
Joined: 18 Sep 2002, 00:00
Location: Hofstade, Zemst - Belgium
Contact:

Post by luchtzak »

Here are a few images:

Image
Image
Image

Picture courtesy Boeing

User avatar
earthman
Posts: 2221
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: AMS

Post by earthman »

What's up with those wings curving upward like that? First the 787, now the new 747?

User avatar
lastrow
Posts: 219
Joined: 09 May 2005, 00:00
Location: Berlin, GER
Contact:

Post by lastrow »

the reduction of cabin width sounds very interesting indeed. could this be because (if this is not a mistake) to optimse the overall air drag - to get closer to the A330/340?

User avatar
earthman
Posts: 2221
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: AMS

Post by earthman »

Nobody is going to change the fuselage, I'm willing to bet it's an error. Obviously somebody wrote 226 inches instead of 256, and then converted it to metric. And then they wrote it so it looks as if the metric measurement is the original one. Let's see how well Boeing is able to convert metric to inches and back when they build the thing...

User avatar
bits44
Posts: 1889
Joined: 03 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: Vancouver CYVR

Post by bits44 »

There has been no reduction in cabin width, the only additions are length, and composite upgrades to the the wings, and other control surfaces. And though not yet announced there are two carriers expected to place large orders for PAX versions.

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/200 ... 1114h.html



KT

chornedsnorkack
Posts: 428
Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:00

Changing the fuselage...

Post by chornedsnorkack »

earthman wrote:Nobody is going to change the fuselage, I'm willing to bet it's an error. Obviously somebody wrote 226 inches instead of 256, and then converted it to metric. And then they wrote it so it looks as if the metric measurement is the original one. Let's see how well Boeing is able to convert metric to inches and back when they build the thing...
It is not obvious that the issue was just with confusing 2 and 5. Compare

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/7e7/facts.html
Range:
8,500 nautical miles (15,700 km)

Configuration:
Twin aisle

Cross Section:
226 inches (574 centimeters)

Wing Span:
197 feet (60 meters)
So, let´s see how well Boeing 747-800 flies with the wrong fuselage installed...

User avatar
lastrow
Posts: 219
Joined: 09 May 2005, 00:00
Location: Berlin, GER
Contact:

Post by lastrow »

I see. That is a good explanation. Actually I was also sceptical and wondered about the reason/feasibility for making the fuselage smaller. Now it seems clear: they're going to take the advanced 787 fuselage for the new version - good point, chornedsnorkack! :-)

Ovostar
Posts: 939
Joined: 09 Jul 2005, 00:00
Location: GVA&LCY

Post by Ovostar »

The final plane will never be like that, with these so curved wings, it's just for advertising

User avatar
Avro
Posts: 8856
Joined: 28 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Avro »

earthman wrote:What's up with those wings curving upward like that? First the 787, now the new 747?


Well the final wings will probably not be exactly as drawn in those pictures but they will try to make them look like them. In fact I see a trend at Boeing now and that is to use the raked wingtip design rather then the more conventional design. Are they more satisfied with the results of the raked type ? Probably but I would be very pleased if someone could provide us some figures comparing both systems.

By looking at this new design it also seems that the raked wingtips will be much more integrated in the wing. Or in other words, the wing and the raked wingtip will form one body as a whole. This will inevitably give us a more efficient wing.

Now if the wing will really be bent upwards like that we will see ;)

It's also nice to see that Boeing is adopting the tooth shape at the rear end of the bypass cowling and the inner cowling.

Always great to see all the new technologies being applied on new designs :) Let's hope it'll be successful and hopefully we'll see the Queen of the skies for many more years in the air.

As far as the diameter of the fuselage is concerned it would surprise me if they indeed want to reduce it. This would mean that Boing would need to do some major changes on the fuselage as well. This costs a lot !! and would mean an entirely new plane. But time will tell if this was a mistake or not.

Chris

User avatar
bits44
Posts: 1889
Joined: 03 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: Vancouver CYVR

Post by bits44 »

The final plane will never be like that, with these so curved wings, it's just for advertising



I think you will find that the wings on the 747-8 will flex exactly as illustrated in the pictures, just as the 787 wings will. Its a trait of composite wing technology, a bit unnerving but exactly as the engineers intended.

KT
Last edited by bits44 on 16 Nov 2005, 05:42, edited 1 time in total.

grunf
Posts: 5
Joined: 15 Nov 2005, 00:00

Post by grunf »

No changes in fuselage except the two plugs. It would be to costly. Some changes to the wing with composite tech transfer from 787 and other programs.

Also a lot of systems are supposed to be new (cargo, seat tracks for new 16G seats etc).

So plenty of changes not that obvious. But definitely no change in cross section.

User avatar
Knight255
Posts: 741
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 00:00
Location: Daytona Beach, USA

Post by Knight255 »

a bit unerving
That's an understatement!!!! If I have to look up out the window to see the wing....I would be a wee bit distressed. 8O I know they flex now, but in those pictures, that is amazing. :wow:
"What's this button do?? I don't know, push it and find out................."

Ovostar
Posts: 939
Joined: 09 Jul 2005, 00:00
Location: GVA&LCY

Post by Ovostar »

Yeah, the pictures are absolutely AMAZING!!!!! but as a lot a said earlier, i ams sure that the final plane will have very differents wings than the citures....


ANyway, That boeing launches the 747-8 IS very good news for me, a HUUUUGE 747 FAN!

Why is it called 747-8 and not 747-800 ?

User avatar
bits44
Posts: 1889
Joined: 03 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: Vancouver CYVR

Post by bits44 »

Why is it called 747-8 and not 747-800

I've heard from friends at Boeing that it was called the 747-8 because it will share many technologies from the 7"8"7 and its range will be "8" thousand miles, and "8" is a very lucky number in the Far East.


that's just what I've heard. :thumbsup:

User avatar
lastrow
Posts: 219
Joined: 09 May 2005, 00:00
Location: Berlin, GER
Contact:

Post by lastrow »

I am sure that the "8" has also been chosen to indicate the competition with the A380. So, we are in the 8-era of aircrafts! ;-)

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 40839
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Post by sn26567 »

bits44 wrote:There has been no reduction in cabin width, the only additions are length, and composite upgrades to the the wings, and other control surfaces.
Indeed, the length is increased by 3.60 m. This will increase the capacity from 416 to 450 seats. Still a long way to go before they reach the capacity of the A380.
André
ex Sabena #26567

User avatar
CX
Posts: 788
Joined: 30 Jul 2005, 00:00

Post by CX »

No way the wings will turn out like that... if any of you have played the strategy game Empire Earth before, the Titan Bomber you get in Nano Age doesn't have flexed wings that flexes that much! I guess it's just advertising against Airbus' more 'realistic' CGIs of the A350, making the A350 looks like something from 10years ago...

User avatar
earthman
Posts: 2221
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: AMS

Post by earthman »

Maybe it will be flapping it's wings like a bird to fly, and that's what causes the curvature? ;-)

Post Reply