Biman Bangladesh will get rid of it's old aircraft, maintenance and fuel costs are very high. Biman will be more efficiënt.
Next year, June, they will receive four new aircraft: two A330 and two 777. This is also necessary to fly to Europe or the USA. Those new aircraft will replace some old ones.
They will also reduce or stop routes which are not profitable. For example: the route New York - Dhaka costs a lot and is not profitable, they fly one or two times a week. They will use those routes only in codeshare. So, will this mean that they will stop flying to New York with a technical stop in BRU??
Or they have to fly with more modern equipment to New York, restrictions are very high on that airport.
Source: http://asia.news.yahoo.com
Biman: new aircraft and stopping non-profitable routes
Moderator: Latest news team
-
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 21 Apr 2005, 00:00
Strange to read that the route to NY is not profitable. The planes are always full. Even business class. Maybe they transport some cargo as well.
About the new planes, I have sent also a lead about this continuous saga some months ago. The reality is that this has been anounced already for 5 years and untill now they still fly the left over DC-10's.
The technical stop in Brussels is maybe not so expensive. I assume that Biman cannot behave in the same way at Schiphol or Frankfurt.
Somewhere I fear that the replacement of the DC-10's will not improve the Biman product. I think that the major cause of the problems is the way it is managed. On the other hand I do have some respect for the Biman staff. They keep on flying.
About the new planes, I have sent also a lead about this continuous saga some months ago. The reality is that this has been anounced already for 5 years and untill now they still fly the left over DC-10's.
The technical stop in Brussels is maybe not so expensive. I assume that Biman cannot behave in the same way at Schiphol or Frankfurt.
Somewhere I fear that the replacement of the DC-10's will not improve the Biman product. I think that the major cause of the problems is the way it is managed. On the other hand I do have some respect for the Biman staff. They keep on flying.
Maybe it is too expensive to keep personal at BRU and JFK for only two flights a week. Maybe the rout could become profitable if they would fly it with a higher frequency. Ofcourse for this they need new planes and ofcourse the passengers. Maybe the traffic is not high enough for more flights from Dhaka to JFK.regi wrote:Strange to read that the route to NY is not profitable. The planes are always full. Even business class. Maybe they transport some cargo as well.
-
- Posts: 848
- Joined: 13 Sep 2004, 00:00
- Location: Jodoigne/Geldenaken
- Contact:
Quite right your suggestion for improved frequencies.waldova wrote: Maybe it is too expensive to keep personal at BRU and JFK for only two flights a week. Maybe the rout could become profitable if they would fly it with a higher frequency. Ofcourse for this they need new planes and ofcourse the passengers. Maybe the traffic is not high enough for more flights from Dhaka to JFK.
To have the planes filled in however they need a 5th freedom right on the route BRU-JFK, and I am not sure the US authorities would grant that or would they? (they are willing to grant it to 1W on their much awaited flight to NWK so why not?)
And they need of course to upgrade the product ito a/c quality, punctuality, confort (shortening the stopover in BRU a.o.)
- Bruspotter
- Posts: 2068
- Joined: 04 Sep 2004, 00:00
- Location: (Antwerp/Belgium)
- Contact:
Hello
I think it's only possible with a B777ER/LR , and Maybe with a A330-200 , but certainly not with the A330-300 , not even with ETOPS. Because it's already quickly a rough 13000/14000km straight away I think. (can't measure it , a map isn't correct , and I don't have globe anymore...broke down).
So it IS really far.
Does anyone knows the correct distance?
Best regards: Yannick
I think it's only possible with a B777ER/LR , and Maybe with a A330-200 , but certainly not with the A330-300 , not even with ETOPS. Because it's already quickly a rough 13000/14000km straight away I think. (can't measure it , a map isn't correct , and I don't have globe anymore...broke down).
So it IS really far.
Does anyone knows the correct distance?
Best regards: Yannick
- sab319
- Posts: 2142
- Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 00:00
- Location: Mortsel, antwerp, Flanders, Belgium, Europe, Earth, Milky way
- Contact:
JFK (40°38'23"N 73°46'44"W) BRU (50°54'05"N 04°29'04"E) 3667 mi 5901 km
BRU (50°54'05"N 04°29'04"E) DAC (23°50'36"N 90°23'52"E) 4790 mi 7709 km
DAC (23°50'36"N 90°23'52"E) JFK (40°38'23"N 73°46'44"W) 7880 mi 12681 km
Range:
A330-200 6750nm/12500km
A330-300 5650nm/10500km
A340-300 7400nm/13700km
B777-200 5210nm/9649km
B777-200ER 7730nm/14316km
BRU (50°54'05"N 04°29'04"E) DAC (23°50'36"N 90°23'52"E) 4790 mi 7709 km
DAC (23°50'36"N 90°23'52"E) JFK (40°38'23"N 73°46'44"W) 7880 mi 12681 km
Range:
A330-200 6750nm/12500km
A330-300 5650nm/10500km
A340-300 7400nm/13700km
B777-200 5210nm/9649km
B777-200ER 7730nm/14316km
I was in JFK on Saturday and saw Biman's DC-10. I must admin it looked a bit strange next to other international aircrafts such as Royal Air Maroc's 767.
It will be a shame to see them go from BRU but I think the choice to move to a more fuel economical aircraft makes perfect sense in this unpredictable future.
Captain
It will be a shame to see them go from BRU but I think the choice to move to a more fuel economical aircraft makes perfect sense in this unpredictable future.
Captain
How are the loads on the route Delhi - Brussels - New York? More specific, are there people who's destination's is BRU? When I was working, years ago, at the airport the aircraft was everytime full, but I don't know how many people make a stopover.
At this time, Delhi is the only long haul destination in the region from BRU.
I that opinion I think they will still need a technical stop at Bru for their trip to the USA. I don't think that an A330 could do that in one way.
At this time, Delhi is the only long haul destination in the region from BRU.
I that opinion I think they will still need a technical stop at Bru for their trip to the USA. I don't think that an A330 could do that in one way.
biman fleet
i am not too sure ,that biman will be getting new generation aircrafts soon, because it still has a lot of obsticles to overcome,primarily ,govermental. Also it needs to restrature its management team ,and bring in people that know how to manage.
-
- Posts: 1229
- Joined: 14 Nov 2005, 00:00