Aviation24.be

Thank you Bralo20.

No, the airport is not approved for that by the BCAA as it is below almost all possible safety and security standards to allow commercial longhaul operations to Belgium. It was upgraded by SN to allow their B737 flights. I understand accommodating a B737 or an A330 is not exactly the same thing, bu...

Couldn't say it better, sean!

RoMax wrote:
Meanwhile they are leaving the BRU-EDI market, leaving this route to SN.

What a nice coincidence!

The article refers to "refines forecast". I didn't see mention of "reduced" forecast in it. But I may have missed something.

Itch Hiking

Sorry André; I tried to resist but...

For those who like to look around for future additions to the fleet next year, maybe have a look for A319 and A320 too... ;) Of course it would be nice to see a few more A319s and A320s joining SN's fleet. However they urgently need l/h aircraft as the A330s seem to be struggling again. And SN seem...

I was told SFM is in Malta and SFV has been out of order for more than a week . No details.

Thanks for the info RoMax.

I fully agree with that.

How pleasant to read the objective, informative and well-balanced contributions of André and Jan hereabove! We need more of these.

So much for a potential SN flight to YUL next year!

How many orders and options to date?

Which aircraft is bmi using on that route? Thanks.

jan_olieslagers wrote:
Because it would need to change direction ("kop maken") at the airport, driving in from the South and leaving to the South again.

I thought the famous (and expensive!) diabolo was meant to avoid that constraint.

If LH passes on this(these) destination(s) to SN, it needs to pass on the aircraft as well!

My conclusion is somewhere between sean's and that of the rest of the forum members: yes, I condemn some of the practices of Ryanair,............. But on the other hand: their business model is widely known and expecting anything that even remotely smells like customer service is simply naïve. Yet,...

What do the experts make of that?

I don't know howlong ago the rule of 1 F/A per 50 pax was established; if its an already old rule, why is Boeing (and maybe Airbus) proposing 215, 180 or 189 pax configurations instead of optimizing them?

If (big IF!) the story about the 70 € for printing a boarding pass is true, this is not a trick, this is EXTORTION, pure and simple! How can anyone even start to think about trying to justify this?