Boeing 737 MAX

Families of 737 MAX crash victims urge judge to reject Dept of Justice–Boeing non-prosecution agreement

Share

Families of victims killed in the two Boeing 737 MAX 8 crashes have filed a motion opposing the U.S. Department of Justice’s new non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Boeing, calling it legally improper and morally unacceptable.

The motion, filed late Wednesday in federal court in Texas, argues that the DOJ is bypassing judicial oversight by entering into an agreement that binds it not to prosecute Boeing before Judge Reed O’Connor rules on a pending dismissal motion. The families say this violates Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which requires court approval for dismissing criminal charges.

“The Government and Boeing have already decided they won’t even wait for the Court’s ruling,” the motion states, calling the NPA’s structure an “unprecedented effort” to block judicial review and “contrary to public policy.”

Led by attorney Paul Cassell, a law professor and pro bono representative for the families, the brief blasts the DOJ’s approach as a dangerous precedent. It argues that such a move could erode the power of the judiciary in future criminal cases and allow prosecutors to avoid meaningful accountability for corporate defendants.

Cassell also criticises the NPA for lacking independent safety oversight and failing to hold Boeing criminally accountable for the 346 lives lost in the 2018 and 2019 crashes. He urges the court to reject what he calls a “misleading and unfair deal”.

This marks the latest chapter in a years-long legal battle. Boeing was originally charged in January 2021 with defrauding the FAA, but the DOJ entered a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) that was later ruled breached in May 2024. A subsequent plea deal in July 2024 was rejected in December by Judge O’Connor. Last month, DOJ and Boeing introduced a new NPA involving $688 million in total payments and additional safety investments, but no trial.

The families have repeatedly requested a meeting with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi since February, with no response. They now ask the court to void the NPA, reject DOJ’s motion to dismiss, and set the case for trial, restoring full legal accountability.

Boeing’s CEO and legal team admitted to fraud months ago, yet the DOJ’s current strategy may let the company avoid a criminal conviction—a move the families contend is against both the law and the public interest.

This post was published on 18 June 2025 22:42

André Orban

M. Sc. Engineering

Published by
André Orban

Recent Posts

Four pilots killed in Philippine Air Force training collision

Four pilots were killed when two Philippine Air Force SF-260 trainer aircraft collided in mid-air…

25 October 2026

Western Sydney Airport welcomes first passenger flights

Western Sydney International Airport opened to passengers on Sunday, 25 October, with a sold-out Jetstar…

25 October 2026

Airbus forecasts 46% growth in global freighter fleet by 2045

Airbus expects the worldwide dedicated freighter fleet to grow from 2,360 aircraft in 2026 to…

24 October 2026

American posts record revenue but fuel costs drive third-quarter loss

American Airlines reported record third-quarter revenue of US$16.3 billion, up 19.3% year-on-year, but higher fuel…

24 October 2026

Storm Austen forces flight cancellations and diversions across Western Europe

Storm Austen disrupted air travel across Western Europe on Friday, 23 October, forcing cancellations in…

24 October 2026

Romanian airline Dan Air files for insolvency amid €10 million environmental debt

Romanian carrier seeks protection from creditors as total liabilities reach €25.4 million; flight operations face…

23 October 2026