Boeing 737

Boeing issues statement on AOA Disagree Alert after publication of article saying it knew about 737 MAX problem since 2017

Share

It took Boeing a year to let airlines and regulators know that the alerts that would have warned pilots that two sensors were out of whack weren’t working, according to an article in The Wall Street Journal.

Boeing reacted with the following statement on Sunday evening, 5 May 2019:

“On every airplane delivered to our customers, including the MAX, all flight data and information needed to safely operate the aircraft is provided in the flight deck on the primary flight deck displays. This information is provided full-time in the pilots’ primary field of view, and it always has been.

Air speed, attitude, altitude, vertical speed, heading and engine power settings are the primary parameters the flight crews use to safely operate the airplane in normal flight. Stick shaker and the pitch limit indicator are the primary features used for the operation of the airplane at elevated angles of attack. All recommended pilot actions, checklists, and training are based upon these primary indicators. Neither the angle of attack indicator nor the AOA Disagree alert are necessary for the safe operation of the airplane. They provide supplemental information only, and have never been considered safety features on commercial jet transport airplanes.

The Boeing design requirements for the 737 MAX included the AOA Disagree alert as a standard, standalone feature, in keeping with Boeing’s fundamental design philosophy of retaining commonality with the 737NG. In 2017, within several months after beginning 737 MAX deliveries, engineers at Boeing identified that the 737 MAX display system software did not correctly meet the AOA Disagree alert requirements. The software delivered to Boeing linked the AOA Disagree alert to the AOA indicator, which is an optional feature on the MAX and the NG. Accordingly, the software activated the AOA Disagree alert only if an airline opted for the AOA indicator.

When the discrepancy between the requirements and the software was identified, Boeing followed its standard process for determining the appropriate resolution of such issues. That review, which involved multiple company subject matter experts, determined that the absence of the AOA Disagree alert did not adversely impact airplane safety or operation. Accordingly, the review concluded, the existing functionality was acceptable until the alert and the indicator could be delinked in the next planned display system software update. Senior company leadership was not involved in the review and first became aware of this issue in the aftermath of the Lion Air accident.

Approximately a week after the Lion Air accident, on November 6, 2018, Boeing issued an Operations Manual Bulletin (OMB), which was followed a day later by the FAA’s issuance of an Airworthiness Directive (AD). In identifying the AOA Disagree alert as one among a number of indications that could result from erroneous AOA, both the OMB and the AD described the AOA Disagree alert feature as available only if the AOA indicator option is installed.

Boeing discussed the status of the AOA Disagree alert with the FAA in the wake of the Lion Air accident. At that time, Boeing informed the FAA that Boeing engineers had identified the software issue in 2017 and had determined per Boeing’s standard process that the issue did not adversely impact airplane safety or operation. In December 2018, Boeing convened a Safety Review Board (SRB) to consider again whether the absence of the AOA Disagree alert from certain 737 MAX flight displays presented a safety issue. That SRB confirmed Boeing’s prior conclusion that it did not. Boeing shared this conclusion and the supporting SRB analysis with the FAA.

Boeing is issuing a display system software update, to implement the AOA Disagree alert as a standard, standalone feature before the MAX returns to service. When the MAX returns to service, all MAX production aircraft will have an activated and operable AOA Disagree alert and an optional angle of attack indicator. All customers with previously delivered MAX airplanes will have the ability to activate the AOA Disagree alert.”

END OF STATEMENT

We shall not comment about this statement, just reproduce a link to the article of Andrew Tangel in the Wall Street Journal: “Boeing Co. didn’t share information about a problem with a cockpit safety alert for about a year before the issue drew attention after an October crash, according to industry and government officials“: https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeing-knew-about-safety-alert-problem-for-a-year-before-telling-faa-airlines-11557087129

 

This post was published on 5 May 2019 22:31

André Orban

M. Sc. Engineering

Published by
André Orban

Recent Posts

Snowbirds bid farewell to CT-114 Tutor with final Moose Jaw performance

The Canadian Forces Snowbirds marked the end of an era on Friday, October 16, with…

16 October 2026

Lufthansa schedules first A350-1000 passenger flight to Tokyo on 3 December

Lufthansa plans to introduce its first Airbus A350-1000 on the Munich–Tokyo Haneda route on 3…

15 October 2026

EUROCONTROL’s Maastricht centre more than halves summer air traffic delays

EUROCONTROL’s Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre (MUAC) handled 842,259 flights between May and September 2026,…

15 October 2026

LOT parent plans dedicated cargo airline under new growth strategy

Polska Grupa Lotnicza (PGL), the aviation group behind LOT Polish Airlines, plans to establish a…

15 October 2026

airBaltic aircraft lands safely at Brussels Airport following technical emergency

An airBaltic A220-300 aircraft registered YL-ABS arriving from Berlin as flight SN2590 on behalf of…

15 October 2026

Norwegian expands UK–Oslo flights to support Norway’s ski tourism push

Norwegian Air Shuttle is increasing winter capacity between the UK and Oslo as part of…

15 October 2026