Lufthansa is trying to sue passengers for skiplagging

A forum to discuss all aviation items (not for latest aviation news and military aviation news)

Moderator: Latest news team

Post Reply
sn-remember
Posts: 811
Joined: 13 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Jodoigne/Geldenaken
Contact:

Lufthansa is trying to sue passengers for skiplagging

Post by sn-remember » 10 Feb 2019, 14:58

Now this retains my attention ...
On one hand, a Spanish court recently ruled that Iberia passengers could not be punished for skiplagging.
On the other hand, the Berlin-Mitte court just pronounced a more ambiguous sentence .. giving LH sufficient grounds it seems to appeal the decision.
My view is that once a deal is done (I mean paid for) it's done. Whatever happens later regarding the show (or not show) of the passenger should not affect the deal. The airline should not be allowed IMHO to track down a passenger itinary in order to sue him later for an "illicit" no show. It's not their business to do so and it is an offence to the individual's basic rights.
Spanish court +1
And you what's your opinion on skiplagging ?
https://simpleflying.com/lufthansa-is-t ... iplagging/

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 34199
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Re: Lufthansa Is Trying To Sue Passengers For Skiplagging

Post by sn26567 » 10 Feb 2019, 15:52

The court was right to say that the Lufthansa price calculation lacks transparency. How can a longer itinerary be less expensive or a shorter itinerary more expensive?
André
ex Sabena #26567

sn-remember
Posts: 811
Joined: 13 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Jodoigne/Geldenaken
Contact:

Re: Lufthansa Is Trying To Sue Passengers For Skiplagging

Post by sn-remember » 11 Feb 2019, 13:43

It's common parctice I believe (otherwise what is skiplagging about ?). But is skiplagging legal, that's the question. If it's legal, there is obviously less point for airlines to offer discounted rates to tag-ons pax since p2p pax can enter that scheme also with a slight twist.
The German judge implies that the customer should know that practice (since he profits from it):(quote) " the court said that it was public knowledge that hidden city ticketing was cheaper, and as such, the defendant cannot claim ignorance.
therefore "the court said the reason Lufthansa is trying to sue the passenger is valid"
Now this statement seems in total contradiction with the previous ruling some months ago in a Spanish court.
And a naive customer (like you André ? ;-))could well believe it's a loophole in the airline ticket offering or a special sale he is entitled to profit from ?
But is it legal (it shouldn't be IMHO) to sue passengers for "no show" cases like this one ? That's the main point in question, and the 2 rulings from 2 different courts in the EU seem contradictory.

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 34199
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Re: Lufthansa Is Trying To Sue Passengers For Skiplagging

Post by sn26567 » 11 Feb 2019, 14:25

sn-remember wrote:
11 Feb 2019, 13:43
But is it legal (it shouldn't be IMHO) to sue passengers for "no show" cases like this one ? That's the main point in question, and the 2 rulings from 2 different courts in the EU seem contradictory.
Therefore, I would not be surprised if the case goes up to the Court of Justice of the European Union. And maybe the consumer associations will intervene to defend their members confronted with the problem.
André
ex Sabena #26567

b720
Posts: 834
Joined: 04 May 2006, 00:00

Re: Lufthansa Is Trying To Sue Passengers For Skiplagging

Post by b720 » 11 Feb 2019, 15:02

It is truly an unfriendly airline!
I avoid it whenever I can..

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 34199
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Re: Lufthansa Is Trying To Sue Passengers For Skiplagging

Post by sn26567 » 11 Feb 2019, 18:16

The case now also appears in the press:

https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/ne ... 73371.html
André
ex Sabena #26567

sn-remember
Posts: 811
Joined: 13 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Jodoigne/Geldenaken
Contact:

Re: Lufthansa Is Trying To Sue Passengers For Skiplagging

Post by sn-remember » 11 Feb 2019, 19:08

sn-remember wrote:
11 Feb 2019, 13:43
If it's legal, there is obviously less point for airlines to offer discounted rates to tag-ons pax since p2p pax can enter that scheme also with a slight twist.
In fact it's more than a "slight twist" since the luggage in the hold will be forwarded to the end destination as the ticket requests. So the skiplagging customer must take care of this .. and travel with a light cabin bag only.
That's already a "price to pay" for this "clever advantage" and clearly not to the taste of every traveler. So this should also be taken into account in the court ruling since the skiplagging passenger is somehow hurt (or limited) by this practice he nonetheless opted for.

Acid-drop
Posts: 2528
Joined: 29 Jun 2005, 00:00
Location: Liège, BE
Contact:

Re: Lufthansa Is Trying To Sue Passengers For Skiplagging

Post by Acid-drop » 11 Feb 2019, 19:41

The real shame is that skiplagging cant be used for round trip.
A no show on one flight shouldnt cancel the return flight.
If its paid its paid. If you decide to do one leg on a donkey's back its your choice.
My messages reflect my personal opinion which may be different than yours. I beleive a forum is made to create a debate so I encourage people to express themselves, the way they want, with the ideas they want. I expect the same understanding in return.

sn-remember
Posts: 811
Joined: 13 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: Jodoigne/Geldenaken
Contact:

Re: Lufthansa is trying to sue passengers for skiplagging

Post by sn-remember » 11 Feb 2019, 21:23

Acid-drop wrote:
11 Feb 2019, 19:41
The real shame is that skiplagging cant be used for round trip.
A no show on one flight shouldnt cancel the return flight.
If its paid its paid. If you decide to do one leg on a donkey's back its your choice.
:o :twisted: It's a real shame indeed.
The airline should be sued for doing that, not the passenger !

b720
Posts: 834
Joined: 04 May 2006, 00:00

Re: Lufthansa Is Trying To Sue Passengers For Skiplagging

Post by b720 » 11 Feb 2019, 22:08

Acid-drop wrote:
11 Feb 2019, 19:41
The real shame is that skiplagging cant be used for round trip.
A no show on one flight shouldnt cancel the return flight.
If its paid its paid. If you decide to do one leg on a donkey's back its your choice.
It is actually on the return.. for an example.. on SN one way GVA - BRU - LHR can be much cheaper than one way GVA-BRU
one can books the former and walk out at BRU without flying the BRU - LHR leg .. this way ends up paying much less than the GVA- BRU one way.

Acid-drop
Posts: 2528
Joined: 29 Jun 2005, 00:00
Location: Liège, BE
Contact:

Re: Lufthansa is trying to sue passengers for skiplagging

Post by Acid-drop » 12 Feb 2019, 08:06

Yes one way only.
Has anyone sued an airlines for a cancelation after a no show ?
My messages reflect my personal opinion which may be different than yours. I beleive a forum is made to create a debate so I encourage people to express themselves, the way they want, with the ideas they want. I expect the same understanding in return.

MHG
Posts: 49
Joined: 21 May 2005, 00:00
Location: near Mannheim, Germany (MHG/EDFM)
Contact:

Re: Lufthansa is trying to sue passengers for skiplagging

Post by MHG » 16 Feb 2019, 09:06

There is much more to it than visible at first sight - and communicated in most media.

In that particular case it was easy for LH to have proof of the passenger intentionally skipping the last leg.
That passenger had booked a corresponding one-way ticket with LH on a separate booking for FRA-TXL fitting perfectly to the arrival time of his incoming flight at FRA ...
(if he had booked a corresponding flight on U2 for FRA-TXL this court case might not even have happened ...)

Regardless of this I strongly hope that the court will dismiss LH´s attempt.
Simply because it would be a non-justified one-sided advantage for the airlines in general.
It is the same as if I buy a cheaper multipack of softdrinks in a neighbouring country but decide to drink only part of the cans - and would be forced to pay the difference to the higher unit price in my home country ...
This is not what the European common market is about.

... and it´s no excuse just because it´s a practice that´s handled this way already for a long time.
A wrong (illegal ?) practice does not become legal because of "grandfather rights"

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 34199
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Re: Lufthansa is trying to sue passengers for skiplagging

Post by sn26567 » 17 Feb 2019, 17:24

If you want to benefit from the system, here is the website to do so:

https://skiplagged.com/
André
ex Sabena #26567

Post Reply