Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

Post Reply
User avatar
HQ_BRU_Lover
Posts: 402
Joined: 22 May 2013, 20:44

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by HQ_BRU_Lover »

Atlantis wrote: 11 Sep 2024, 21:01Not remarkable at all if you know the Shift 2027 after Covid. All airports, not only BRU, are going for diversification. Real Estate brings in a lot of money. With only aviation related you will not make it anymore.
Exactly! It's even a logical decision that they invest in what should bring them extra recurring revenues, even if the core business (=flights, airport operations) would do a downfall, being it extremely big like Covid or being it fluctuation of the economy which is not doing as it should. From an aviation lover point-of-view all this is not interesting of course, so I also understand that on this aviation forum people are mentioning this.

JOVAN2
Posts: 137
Joined: 19 Sep 2022, 11:06

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by JOVAN2 »

HQ_BRU_Lover wrote: 12 Sep 2024, 08:39
Atlantis wrote: 11 Sep 2024, 21:01Not remarkable at all if you know the Shift 2027 after Covid. All airports, not only BRU, are going for diversification. Real Estate brings in a lot of money. With only aviation related you will not make it anymore.
Exactly! It's even a logical decision that they invest in what should bring them extra recurring revenues, even if the core business (=flights, airport operations) would do a downfall, being it extremely big like Covid or being it fluctuation of the economy which is not doing as it should. From an aviation lover point-of-view all this is not interesting of course, so I also understand that on this aviation forum people are mentioning this.
Since about one year there is a big crisis in real estate business. Many empty or partly empty office towers all over Europe.
Partly because of Covid.

Crisis will be there for some years.

An airport should have a mix of business, but it is totally ridiculous and short sighted to invest only in non-passenger related things.
Only few parts of the airport reach European standards
Many issues remain un-resolved:
Passport control Pier B arrivals
Long waiting times luggage
Taxi area
Bus area

The lack of ambition of BRU management is striking. And unprofessional.

User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5091
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by Atlantis »

JOVAN2 wrote: 12 Sep 2024, 11:42
HQ_BRU_Lover wrote: 12 Sep 2024, 08:39
Atlantis wrote: 11 Sep 2024, 21:01Not remarkable at all if you know the Shift 2027 after Covid. All airports, not only BRU, are going for diversification. Real Estate brings in a lot of money. With only aviation related you will not make it anymore.
Exactly! It's even a logical decision that they invest in what should bring them extra recurring revenues, even if the core business (=flights, airport operations) would do a downfall, being it extremely big like Covid or being it fluctuation of the economy which is not doing as it should. From an aviation lover point-of-view all this is not interesting of course, so I also understand that on this aviation forum people are mentioning this.
Since about one year there is a big crisis in real estate business. Many empty or partly empty office towers all over Europe.
Partly because of Covid.

Crisis will be there for some years.

An airport should have a mix of business, but it is totally ridiculous and short sighted to invest only in non-passenger related things.
Only few parts of the airport reach European standards
Many issues remain un-resolved:
Passport control Pier B arrivals
Long waiting times luggage
Taxi area
Bus area

The lack of ambition of BRU management is striking. And unprofessional.
Only non-pax???? May I remind you that all airbridges at the B-pier are or will be renewed by single or double bridges.

That Brucargo is full under construction to give all employees , customers and cargo airlines the best service.

That P30 will be a fresh, new, light rental car parking instead of the dark one which is now.

And many other smaller ones which I forgot

This is not related to pax? Or it's not exciting enough from aviation enthusiastic perspective?

JOVAN2
Posts: 137
Joined: 19 Sep 2022, 11:06

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by JOVAN2 »

Atlantis wrote: 12 Sep 2024, 17:13
JOVAN2 wrote: 12 Sep 2024, 11:42
HQ_BRU_Lover wrote: 12 Sep 2024, 08:39 Exactly! It's even a logical decision that they invest in what should bring them extra recurring revenues, even if the core business (=flights, airport operations) would do a downfall, being it extremely big like Covid or being it fluctuation of the economy which is not doing as it should. From an aviation lover point-of-view all this is not interesting of course, so I also understand that on this aviation forum people are mentioning this.
Since about one year there is a big crisis in real estate business. Many empty or partly empty office towers all over Europe.
Partly because of Covid.

Crisis will be there for some years.

An airport should have a mix of business, but it is totally ridiculous and short sighted to invest only in non-passenger related things.
Only few parts of the airport reach European standards
Many issues remain un-resolved:
Passport control Pier B arrivals
Long waiting times luggage
Taxi area
Bus area

The lack of ambition of BRU management is striking. And unprofessional.
Only non-pax???? May I remind you that all airbridges at the B-pier are or will be renewed by single or double bridges.

That Brucargo is full under construction to give all employees , customers and cargo airlines the best service.

That P30 will be a fresh, new, light rental car parking instead of the dark one which is now.

And many other smaller ones which I forgot

This is not related to pax? Or it's not exciting enough from aviation enthusiastic perspective?

Cargo is non-pax. P30 is mainly for employees and little bit Rental cars. Little bit pax.
You do not remember pax-improvements.
They do not exist at BRU. Apparently. Nobody sees them.

User avatar
Atlantis
Posts: 5091
Joined: 12 Apr 2005, 00:00

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by Atlantis »

JOVAN2 wrote: 13 Sep 2024, 12:20
Atlantis wrote: 12 Sep 2024, 17:13
JOVAN2 wrote: 12 Sep 2024, 11:42

Since about one year there is a big crisis in real estate business. Many empty or partly empty office towers all over Europe.
Partly because of Covid.

Crisis will be there for some years.

An airport should have a mix of business, but it is totally ridiculous and short sighted to invest only in non-passenger related things.
Only few parts of the airport reach European standards
Many issues remain un-resolved:
Passport control Pier B arrivals
Long waiting times luggage
Taxi area
Bus area

The lack of ambition of BRU management is striking. And unprofessional.
Only non-pax???? May I remind you that all airbridges at the B-pier are or will be renewed by single or double bridges.

That Brucargo is full under construction to give all employees , customers and cargo airlines the best service.

That P30 will be a fresh, new, light rental car parking instead of the dark one which is now.

And many other smaller ones which I forgot

This is not related to pax? Or it's not exciting enough from aviation enthusiastic perspective?

Cargo is non-pax. P30 is mainly for employees and little bit Rental cars. Little bit pax.
You do not remember pax-improvements.
They do not exist at BRU. Apparently. Nobody sees them.
Typical troll.

Cargo is as important as pax. Cargo was the main life line during covid for BRU. It generated a lot of money when there were even no pax flights possible.

Maybe think first

User avatar
lumumba
Posts: 2158
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 00:00
Location: brussels Europe

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by lumumba »

They are expanding the passport control area at the arrivals of the non-Schengen terminal.
Hasta la victoria siempre.

User avatar
sn26567
Posts: 40922
Joined: 13 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: Rosières/Rozieren, Belgium
Contact:

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by sn26567 »

lumumba wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 13:51 They are expanding the passport control area at the arrivals of the non-Schengen terminal.
It's nice to extend that area, but it would be even nicer to increase the number of police officers manning the area during the peak hours.
André
ex Sabena #26567

User avatar
lumumba
Posts: 2158
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 00:00
Location: brussels Europe

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by lumumba »

sn26567 wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 22:25
lumumba wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 13:51 They are expanding the passport control area at the arrivals of the non-Schengen terminal.
It's nice to extend that area, but it would be even nicer to increase the number of police officers manning the area during the peak hours.
Who is taking this decision the Police or the Airport authority?
Hasta la victoria siempre.

User avatar
Conti764
Posts: 1925
Joined: 21 Sep 2007, 23:21

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by Conti764 »

lumumba wrote: 15 Sep 2024, 22:48
sn26567 wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 22:25
lumumba wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 13:51 They are expanding the passport control area at the arrivals of the non-Schengen terminal.
It's nice to extend that area, but it would be even nicer to increase the number of police officers manning the area during the peak hours.
Who is taking this decision the Police or the Airport authority?
About staffing? Airport police. But there's not much of a decision to make. They just don't have enough officers :roll:

Another pressing issue is the lack op space at departures. All boxes are often manned, but there are just too few...

User avatar
lumumba
Posts: 2158
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 00:00
Location: brussels Europe

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by lumumba »

Conti764 wrote: 15 Sep 2024, 22:51
lumumba wrote: 15 Sep 2024, 22:48
sn26567 wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 22:25

It's nice to extend that area, but it would be even nicer to increase the number of police officers manning the area during the peak hours.
Who is taking this decision the Police or the Airport authority?
About staffing? Airport police. But there's not much of a decision to make. They just don't have enough officers :roll:

Another pressing issue is the lack op space at departures. All boxes are often manned, but there are just too few...
So there is no solution?
Maybe it's beter to refuse some new non Schengen airlines for the moment to improve the service?
Hasta la victoria siempre.

User avatar
longwings
Posts: 179
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 03:51

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by longwings »

lumumba wrote: 15 Sep 2024, 23:25Maybe it's beter to refuse some new non Schengen airlines for the moment to improve the service?
Aviation is complicated. Short answer is, unless the airport is out of gates - including gates for remote stands - when an airline wants to operate, denying them access is fraught with risks. It doesn't matter if police control is a choke point.

Denying access to EU airlines when a gate is available is an infringement of the single European aviation market. The airline could sue the airport operator to force the issue.

For non-EU airlines, their access is usually guaranteed by bilateral treaty - whether between Belgium and another country, or the EU and another country. Treaty infractions typically are met with reprisals, which can take just about any form. Example, if BRU were to deny an additional Chinese passenger flight, there's nothing stopping CAAC from curtailing or stopping ASL Belgium or FedEx flights from LGG in retaliation. The Chinese government could even retaliate in ways that have nothing to do with aviation.

A government edict to cap flights across the board might work, or not. The Dutch government gave up its earlier attempts to impose a lower cap on AMS when the US Dept. of Transportation warned them KLM would lose traffic rights for every US airline flight canceled as a result of the new cap.

User avatar
Conti764
Posts: 1925
Joined: 21 Sep 2007, 23:21

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by Conti764 »

lumumba wrote: 15 Sep 2024, 23:25
Conti764 wrote: 15 Sep 2024, 22:51
lumumba wrote: 15 Sep 2024, 22:48
Who is taking this decision the Police or the Airport authority?
About staffing? Airport police. But there's not much of a decision to make. They just don't have enough officers :roll:

Another pressing issue is the lack op space at departures. All boxes are often manned, but there are just too few...
So there is no solution?
Hire more police officers for the airport but there is an overall shortage in police officers all over the country.

They sometimes send in new recruits but those often young officers choose to join a local police force as soon as possible.

The only way you can expand the numbers of officers working at BRU is by offering them an allowance. But allowances are heavily reduced by the police, the government is debt burden and even if BAC would want to pay (part of) such allowance, I doubt it would be allowed legally...

User avatar
lumumba
Posts: 2158
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 00:00
Location: brussels Europe

Re: Brussels Airport (BRU) infrastructure: future

Post by lumumba »

Conti764 wrote: 16 Sep 2024, 11:01
lumumba wrote: 15 Sep 2024, 23:25
Conti764 wrote: 15 Sep 2024, 22:51

About staffing? Airport police. But there's not much of a decision to make. They just don't have enough officers :roll:

Another pressing issue is the lack op space at departures. All boxes are often manned, but there are just too few...
So there is no solution?
Hire more police officers for the airport but there is an overall shortage in police officers all over the country.

They sometimes send in new recruits but those often young officers choose to join a local police force as soon as possible.

The only way you can expand the numbers of officers working at BRU is by offering them an allowance. But allowances are heavily reduced by the police, the government is debt burden and even if BAC would want to pay (part of) such allowance, I doubt it would be allowed legally...
So anyway if I understood we'll there is no solution and this problem will occur more and more...
Hasta la victoria siempre.

Post Reply