Yes the US (probably) destinations would be launched for this winter. But it's my opinion to open booking most early if possible in the belgian market to find belgians customers (and maybe french, dutch or german) with a large commercial campaing.TLspotting wrote: ↑14 May 2019, 08:32https://www.aviation24.be/airlines/luft ... gs-livery/
Unfortunately,they said Zhengzhou was for Spring, but the end is in 38 days, I don't see when they will launch it but there will be no Belgian on board because they already booked their holidays...sounilr21 wrote: ↑12 May 2019, 14:56Air Belgium it's a joke !
We are in may, and the summer peak begin next month. And we have no more information about the next destinations offered.
It's sad to watch no more development from this airlines and commercials spots the find news customers (other that U-tour, ...).
Why not :
Boston or Philadelphia ;
Montreal or maybe New York ;
There has been no TV Commercial, but many ads through Belgium.
About America, AB clearly said it was for Winter 19-20.
China was firstly chosen due to its shareholders, nearly the half of it is Chinese...
They didn't start from BRU as AB knew CX was going to launch its route so the solution was to avoid BRU and fly from CRL, on the same route...Boavida wrote: ↑13 May 2019, 12:31I'm afraid the whole business plan of Air Belgium has turned out to be a failure. They want to be a low-cost airline in a situation where Belgium is already invaded by numerous low-cost airlines, and with our "national carrier" being transformed into a low-cost also... Secondly, they chose to fly long haul to some Chinese cities from CRL instead of BRU.
With SN gone in the coming year(s), they should present themselves as the new flag carrier, full-service quality airline to Brussels, home of numerous international institutions and the second biggest diplomat city in the world. There must be a market for this.
Maybe in a partnership with a Gulf carrier? Why not?
AB should be the next flagship airline but unfortunately we see them more at WAW, LHR, DXB, JFK, EWR,... rather than BRU or CRL...
The partnership of a Gulf carrier... Emirates is useless, Qatar is now Oneworld and they can codeshare with Air Italy... Etihad, AB will say no. Gulf Air and Kuwait Airways are the only solutions there ?
I think AB left HKG as they didn't see any development to come. Cathay Airways, ex Dragonair and HKexpress are now property of Cathay Pacific. HK Airlines is property of HNA Group, which flies from Brussels to Shenzhen, Beijing, Shanghai Pudong via Hainan Airlines.
But the market is still available.. Primera Air failed... Norwegian is still in the air but wondering for how long.JOVAN wrote: ↑13 May 2019, 22:13I overheard some conversation about this.
QATAR AIRWAYS is a candidate to operate Transatlantic from BRU .
BRU is their first choice because of unique location, available capacity, enormous catchmen area and relatively few flights to US, CND etc.
QR also not keen to fight with KL & AF in their homebase. They know that NL and F governements will never allow their airlines and airports to 'surrender§ to a ME airline.
In Belgium it is another story, with a high degree of incompetence in all political levels.
BRU is a market but no one dares to fly from there, that's why we think we are the middle of nowhere...
But i'm skeptical for this opportunity because the "commercial war" beetween US and China could compromise development. And so, Air Belgium have a half part of Chineses funds.
it's cloudy sky to Air Belgium. No dark, no sunny just difficult on this climate. Hopefull.