The place for all your flight-sim experiences, questions, etc...
Sabena320
Posts: 548 Joined: 13 Jun 2004, 00:00
Location: Europe
Contact:
Skyfighter
Posts: 257 Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: Antwerp (Ekeren)
Post
by Skyfighter » 06 Dec 2006, 18:05
oh very nice!
I like it...
sab319
Posts: 2142 Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 00:00
Location: Mortsel, antwerp, Flanders, Belgium, Europe, Earth, Milky way
Contact:
Post
by sab319 » 06 Dec 2006, 20:40
some great looking shots, but imho, the textures of FSX don't seam to be that much better than FS9...
Sabena320
Posts: 548 Joined: 13 Jun 2004, 00:00
Location: Europe
Contact:
Post
by Sabena320 » 07 Dec 2006, 16:41
bwa some are better, but that bridge is awfull
fokker_f27
Posts: 1812 Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 00:00
Location: Weerde, Zemst - Belgium
Post
by fokker_f27 » 07 Dec 2006, 20:53
Nice shots!
The most sexy girl in the sky: The Sud-Est Caravelle 12.
teddybAIR
Posts: 1602 Joined: 02 Mar 2004, 00:00
Location: Steenokkerzeel
Contact:
Post
by teddybAIR » 08 Dec 2006, 12:29
This just convinced me that I made the right choice not to buy FS X...I grant them: the water textures have improved, but I must say that I only see very limited (no) progress in the land textures...
Skyfighter
Posts: 257 Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 00:00
Location: Antwerp (Ekeren)
Post
by Skyfighter » 11 Dec 2006, 16:53
mmmh...
I think that vista will make it better,if you c the shots in vista
DAT213S
Posts: 74 Joined: 11 Jan 2006, 00:00
Location: Wellen
Contact:
Post
by DAT213S » 21 Dec 2006, 13:29
Nice screens what system do you have to run it like this?
nielsbollen
Posts: 84 Joined: 04 Dec 2005, 00:00
Location: Brugge (Belgium)
Post
by nielsbollen » 22 Dec 2006, 16:07
I'm also gonna stay with FS2004. I will wait untill there are plenty of sceneries available. But I was just wondering if its possible to use the PMDG and stuff that I bought for FS2004 on FSX. Else I think that its a bit of thrown away money.
Greetz,
Niels
Philippe1983
Posts: 69 Joined: 12 Nov 2006, 12:15
Location: B-1367 , near EBBE
Post
by Philippe1983 » 04 Jan 2007, 21:21
DAT213S wrote: Nice screens what system do you have to run it like this?
Yeah, such advanced graphics must be veeeeery demanding in resources !
I bet for an at least 3Ghz machine and 1024Mb DDR2
I can go hide myself, with my old PIII 1Ghz :shakehead: (still going fast in Windows and co. but too slow even for FS2002 with my ton of add-ons !)
Sabena320
Posts: 548 Joined: 13 Jun 2004, 00:00
Location: Europe
Contact:
Post
by Sabena320 » 04 Jan 2007, 22:39
I have dual core 2,8ghz and 2GB RAM and just a standard G-force 6600 graphic card. Sorry for my late reply