Pictures of the Airbus A350! (Awful!)

Join this forum to discuss the latest news that happened in the world of commercial aviation.

Moderator: Latest news team

User avatar
MrAirbus
Posts: 381
Joined: 12 Feb 2004, 00:00
Location: Karlstad, Sweden
Contact:

Pictures of the Airbus A350! (Awful!)

Post by MrAirbus »

Hi everyone!
Airbus.com has now presented there first pictures of the Airbus A350!
What a great disappointment! I truly hope the put more time on it!
Even my little brother could do better job than that!

I suppose we have to wait 3 to 5 years until they put a A350 website like Boeing has for the NightmareLiner 7“Don’t care”7!

Take care!

http://www.airbus.com/MultimediaElements/3246.jpg

http://www.airbus.com/MultimediaElements/3245.jpg

User avatar
sab319
Posts: 2142
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 00:00
Location: Mortsel, antwerp, Flanders, Belgium, Europe, Earth, Milky way
Contact:

Post by sab319 »

Well it still looks a bit better than the B7E7 in my opinion, although I agree they should have put a bit more fantasy in it. Maybe a new colorsheme like boeing did?

SicilianFalcon
Posts: 390
Joined: 11 Oct 2004, 00:00

Post by SicilianFalcon »

Hrmm is the look of the aircraft what Airbus should be concerned about?

I dont think so some how :wink:

Robin_Bamps

Post by Robin_Bamps »

Looks more like a stretched A330...

Boeing really did a great job with the 7E7 design !

Regards, Robin Bamps.

SN30952
Posts: 7128
Joined: 31 Jul 2003, 00:00

Re: PICTURES of the A350! (Awful!)

Post by SN30952 »

MrAirbus wrote:... first pictures of the Airbus A350!
What a great disappointment!
But I like this http://www.airbus.com/prehome.asp better indeed.
But lets see what Airbus will make in its "family' section.

BTW Where is Location: KALRSTAD? MrAirbus.
Robin_Bamps wrote:Looks more like a stretched A330...Regards, Robin Bamps.
Seems to be the idea, the 10 Dec press release says:
The new sisterships to the A330s are called “A350” models...they complement the current A330-200 and -300 line, offering extended range in these seating categories.

waldova
Posts: 731
Joined: 21 Aug 2004, 00:00

Post by waldova »

This aircraft looks a lot like the A330. But in my eyes it doesn't look so bad. I'm sure it will change in the following years.

User avatar
bits44
Posts: 1889
Joined: 03 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: Vancouver CYVR

An interesting article from the Boeing Company

Post by bits44 »

Sunday 12th December, 2004

Boeing thanks Airbus for the flattery
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Big News Network.com Sunday 12th December, 2004

The Boeing Co. is welcoming a decision by its European rival to build a plane that can compete with the Chicago company's 7E7.

That's because, Boeing officials say, the Airbus 350 is not much more than an imitation of Boeing's upcoming Dreamliner, as their 7E7 also is known, the Washington Post reported Saturday.

Until recently Airbus had publicly expressed confidence its A330 could hold its own against the 7E7, said Randolph Baseler, Boeing vice president of marketing.

Airbus is out there scrambling, he said. What they've acknowledged is the 7E7 has basically given them a great problem.

The Airbus 350 seeks to match the fuel efficiency, high-technology, and lightweight materials of the Dreamliner, scheduled to begin flying in 2008.

Airbus describes its model as a sister aircraft to an existing line of the company's double-aisle planes. The A350, to begin flying in 2010, will be offered in two versions, seating 245 to 285 passengers. The A350 is to have a range of about 1,500 miles farther than the existing Airbus A330.

User avatar
Zorba
Posts: 1733
Joined: 04 Apr 2003, 00:00
Contact:

Post by Zorba »

Awful? :? Well I don't think it looks awful, it just looks the same as a A330/A340 ...
Even my little brother could do better job than that!
I will take this as an ironic statement ?

And why should you guys care about the color sheme? I don't think any airline cares about the "paintsheme" or the model of an airplane, but performance, that's what's it all about !!

We still have some years to go ahead ... a lot can change ...
Tot hier en verder

User avatar
Avro
Posts: 8856
Joined: 28 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Belgium

Post by Avro »

Well it looks indeed quite similar to an A330, but that was also predicted since the A350 is an "update" of the current A330 fleet.

Let's see if Airbus will put those huge winglets on the A350 as it is pictured above.

I totally agree with you on the fact that an airplane's look isn't important but its performance is.
On the other hand, I also have to agree that Airbus could have a nicer corporate livery. If you compare it to the one of Boeing, it looks awful. Airbus could learn something on that level from their American colleagues.

Chris

User avatar
Andries
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 00:00
Location: OST
Contact:

Post by Andries »

These are just pictures of the A330 prototype which they stretched (or shortened) and then gave it new titles, thats it ...

Although the A350 will be an update of the current A330, I doubt it will look the same like the A330 on the outside. The probably used these images because of a lack of designs to make a CAD (Computer Aded Design) ...

I think we should wait untill we see CAD's of the A350 before judging it ...

Greetz,

:twisted: Andries :twisted:
Don't dream your life, live your dream !!!

User avatar
Advisor
Posts: 3616
Joined: 09 Sep 2004, 03:00
Location: Heart Lies In Rwy 09/27 'D' 'B-3' TaxiTrack
Contact:

Post by Advisor »

Airbus_fan wrote:
Even my little brother could do better job than that!
I will take this as an ironic statement ?

And why should you guys care about the color sheme? I don't think any airline cares about the "paintsheme" or the model of an airplane, but performance, that's what's it all about !!
I agree with him. Airlines have their own paint schemes and livery for be concerned with. The key question here is, PERFORMANCE. :)
Aum Sweet Aum.

User avatar
Ruscoe
Posts: 183
Joined: 15 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: Brisbane

Post by Ruscoe »

Well I don't think it looks as goos as the 330 and I think the reason are those wing tip fences which look very old fashioned, 747 like.

Ruscoe

Rago
Posts: 680
Joined: 02 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: Oostende (B)

Post by Rago »

Just one remarque :

Go for it Airbus!!!!

:banana: :banana: :banana:

Falcon_900
Posts: 21
Joined: 29 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: Spain

Post by Falcon_900 »

I think that, although it seem's to be the same thing that A330 but a little bit longer, is good because this increase the competitive between Airbus and Boeing and made them to do bigger efforts time after time.

That's my opinion.

CN-RAM
Posts: 51
Joined: 25 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: London, UK

Post by CN-RAM »

it looks so standard!

the 7e7 looks good and would deal with any a350 easily

maybe boeing should also concentrate on revamping the 747 - a fantastic plane that shouldn't be allowed to waste away like the (excellent) 707 did

the pictures of the a350 are actually more ruined by the airbus colour scheme on the tail!

User avatar
YYZ727
Posts: 279
Joined: 03 Dec 2004, 00:00
Location: Maldegem, Belgium
Contact:

Post by YYZ727 »

It looks like a very classic design for me. Not too bad after all

C_J
Posts: 498
Joined: 23 Aug 2004, 00:00
Location: BRU

Post by C_J »

probably a bit too classic I guess...

BP
Posts: 102
Joined: 22 Dec 2004, 00:00
Location: Aveiro, Portugal

Post by BP »

I too would have liked Airbus to have projected something better looking, although in this industry looks alone don´t sell. Im quite sure that Airbus will introduce some new improvements that are visable to distinguish it apart from its older sister the A330. Its still too early to make any judgements this early in the game, considering that the final freeze hasnt been givin yet. :D

User avatar
Bruspotter
Posts: 2068
Joined: 04 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: (Antwerp/Belgium)
Contact:

Post by Bruspotter »

Hello folks!

Awful???? WOOOOOW!!!

Might even look nicer than the 330-300.
(not that i'm trying to say that it's ugly with that)

Maybe a little bit because i have made a 'shortcut A330' several years
ago myself , i have made several detail images (drawings) from simply
a shorter 330-200 about 54-52 meters tall i guess. (Can't remember myself :D ) , and i called it the A370 , but yeah...the 350 is good too.

Even stronger...tried the same thing with an A340 ,and it was even nicer...
just looked like an IL-96. (also about 54/52 meters tall)

In every case...i like it.

sab319 wrote:
Well it still looks a bit better than the B7E7 in my opinion, although I agree they should have put a bit more fantasy in it. Maybe a new colorsheme like boeing did?
Indeed i also like it A LOT MORE than the 7E7. (personal opinion)
Fantasy is good , but too much makes it ugly , by my opinion it should stay
the same as the 330 but just shorter. And that will be like that if you see
the pictures. I do agree that airbus may find a more colorful 'house colors' paint sceme. But that's indeed not Airbus's greatest worry.


Best Christmas regards: Yannick :wink: Enjoy your holidays ,
and for al those who are going to travel: BON VOYAGE!

User avatar
ehamspotter
Posts: 501
Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 00:00
Location: Kessel(Belgium)

Post by ehamspotter »

hello;

I think it's a 330 with bigger engines!!!??? :?:



happy newyear regards: ehamspotter

Post Reply