I guess they suspect (or confirmed?) structural issues since according to some posts above they are building a temporary check-in area:Pocahontas wrote:What will the options be if it turns out the terminal has structural issues after the attack? Any idea what the possibilities are?
How long can an international airport remain closed?
jake99 wrote: Also BAC started to build shelters near the connector (swissport side).
Apparently this will be the temporary check-in.
Rumors are that Building 5 will be a baggage claim building
So If this is correct the airport can reopen to some degree maybe after the weekend and gradually pick up pace.
How long the repairs will take is something nobody knows at this point, but I guess it will take months at least and that all depends in which shape the terminals are. You can't forget that the old terminal, in which also a bomb exploded, is almost 60 years old and thus might not be economical viable to repair if the structure is damaged. So I guess best case scenario: months, worst case scenario: +1 year (if (partial?) demolition is deemed necessary since in that case you will need new building permits, environmental studies, the current building regulations are also different compared to 60 years ago (or even 20 years ago), drawings, etc...). Maybe there's even asbestos being used in the old building (I doubt it since it was renovated about 5 years ago, but back in the old days asbestos was a popular ingredient in buildings).
It's certainly not like: a bomb has exploded, let's clean up, put a bit of cement here and there, some fresh plaster, a layer of fresh paint, some new glass and some new tiles and we are done. We all know that's not going to happen how much we all want it to be like that, that's just not realistic.