had a lot on my mind then so i can't remember the airline. the airbus gave power just seconds after the swissport ROP removed the pin so the aircraft collided with the noselifter.
both had a lot of damage from what i could see
airazurxtror wrote:Knowing Jetairfly (as you say), the passengers have likely received the minimum minimorum, and will have to try very hard to get the financial compensation they are due.
Even Jetairfly's minimum minimorum is more then what passengers from Europe's most used airline get when they are entitled to compensation. Altough, I must admit they nowadays get a standard form with apologies (although they would prefer apologies ànd some silver coins).
Inaugurated with great pomp on Friday, the new " e-gates ", these six porticoes that should reduce the waiting time before entering Belgium at Brussels Airport are already down. "They no longer work since Sunday morning ," said the airport federal police.
The passengers were thus redirected to the old desks.
The origin of the technical problem is not yet known but it is bad form two days after the official launch of the device , which cost about 2.4 million euros.
A technician will be dispatched in Zaventem on Monday to try and set the porticoes in working order .
Whahahah! Who did the functional approval testing? Or was it sheer bad luck (as can always happen)?
Will there be an official investigation like after flight incidents/accidents?
airazurxtror wrote:Knowing Jetairfly (as you say), the passengers have likely received the minimum minimorum, and will have to try very hard to get the financial compensation they are due.
Even Jetairfly's minimum minimorum is more then what passengers from Europe's most used airline get when they are entitled to compensation. Altough, I must admit they nowadays get a standard form with apologies (although they would prefer apologies ànd some silver coins).
airazurxtror wrote:Jetairfly policy should follow the rules of Europe
Knowing Jetairfly, the passengers have likely received the minimum minimorum, and will have to try very hard to get the financial compensation they are due.
1. What are your sources to accuse Jetairfly for not having followed the European legislation?
2. Hans Vanhalemeersch, Jetairfly's spokesmen, told on VTM tv that the aircraft who was scheduled for the flight had a broken windshield in Gran Canaria, with no spare one available there. If that was indeed the case, no financial compensation is due.
airazurxtror wrote:Jetairfly policy should follow the rules of Europe
Knowing Jetairfly, the passengers have likely received the minimum minimorum, and will have to try very hard to get the financial compensation they are due.
1. What are your sources to accuse Jetairfly for not having followed the European legislation?
2. Hans Vanhalemeersch, Jetairfly's spokesmen, told on VTM tv that the aircraft who was scheduled for the flight had a broken windshield in Gran Canaria, with no spare one available there. If that was indeed the case, no financial compensation is due.
You're the one asking for sources? The person who on this forum has the no1 spot in throwing accusations without any actual data to back it up besides airlinequality.com, hln and the daily mail .. LMAO
airazurxtror wrote:Knowing Jetairfly, the passengers have likely received the minimum minimorum, and will have to try very hard to get the financial compensation they are due.
Even Jetairfly's minimum minimorum is more then what passengers from Europe's most used airline get when they are entitled to compensation. Altough, I must admit they nowadays get a standard form with apologies (although they would prefer apologies ànd some silver coins).
Sources please?
Funny. Jetairfly is accused here by airazurxtor for not having respected the legislation last Saturday. As soon as Mister see Ryanair's-corporate-website has given his sources for that accusation, I will gladly post a factual list with all complaints about Ryanair not respecting the European legislation.
It's like you guys are begging for posts to be deleted...
Just to make things clear: keep on topic, and don't start with any personal accusations, however thinly veiled the facade ahead of them may be.
If you guys can't stick to these simple rules, posts will be deleted without any prior notice.
An airplane was stuck for three hours Sunday on the tarmac of Brussels Airport as two people had boarded without boarding passes, said Thursday NIEUWS VTM . The two men were accompanying a sick passenger to the terminal A for a flight to Rome. At the security gates , the patient scanned his boarding pass and the two men took the opportunity to sneak between the doors . They also managed to escape the attention of the latest controllers just before boarding the plane. They were finally identified once on board the aircraft . The captain then refused to take off and has made all passengers leave the aircraft.
The person who on this forum has the no1 spot in throwing accusations without any actual data to back it up besides airlinequality.com, hln and the daily mail .. LMAO
just to be clear, im not on the "we" side :/
