Yeah they should forget about looking where they think the Aircraft is and get you to lead them straight to itFlanker2 wrote:The Australian pic doesn't look like anything from a B777 or an airplane at all.
I think that too many false leads are being propagated, I think that their source should be investigated, as they are hampering the SAR efforts.
Using Sheets now to camouflage the Plane! What happened to your previous theory of just throwing sand over it to make it disappear?Flanker2 wrote: IMO they most probably landed in one of the deserts in China.
After all, that's your best combination of no cell phone coverage, discretion, easy to camouflage using sheets and plenty of landing area.
Apart from that the Aircraft would have to go through plenty of airspace well covered by Radar to get anywhere near the Chinese Deserts. The Gobi is relatively Populated for a Desert so it definitely won't be in there - the Taklamakan less so but there are still some people living in and around the Desert and there are some transport routes through it. Anyone in the area would be highly likely to notice a 777 rocking up on their Doorstep. After all it would be possible to clearly hear it during the last 100km or so it traveled on approach if they were within a few kilometres of the flight path. And likewise they would be able to see it descend if it landed in daylight. And if it flew for 7 or 8 hours after departure it would have been daylight by the time it landed. In any case I doubt even you believe they could land safely in the Middle of a Desert full of Sand Dunes in the Dark.
So all thing considered this is certainly one of the least likely places for the Aircraft to be.
Before the wreckage has been found it would be foolish to rule out any causes of the crash. But I agree Pilot Suicide or Mechanical Failure are more likely.Flanker2 wrote: Terrorism can be ruled out, if that was the idea, they would have targeted Singapore or Kualka Lumpur instead of ditching it in the middle of nowhere.