You made the suggestion of 'what could be', the comment on which I replied above implies 'sort of' something else...skumfiduse wrote: Which is what I referred to in my post, albeit formulated in a softer way: [... Eurowings could be happy with this too ...] and [... Lufthansa Group-developments... ] without going into detail about the SN-LH-EW-story, since being discussed elsewhere.
Let's stay with the official story as it is quite the truth: nothing has been decided yet, several options are being considered. But given the location, very far away from the new 'point of gravity' of the terminal complex (being the Connector, as the common point of entry towards all airside facilities for all pax) makes that is (at least on the short term) not the most obvious option to go for 'regular terminal ops'. Yet all options remain open as of today.
It might sound a bit weird to start investing in something, while nothing has been decided yet on the short term future use of the building. However it is only logical to retain this iconic element of BRU and not let the state of the building deteriorate further (besides the esthetic value of the building itself and the overall airside view of the airport with modern buildings like Gateway and Passport next to it). Options enough on what to do with it afterwards and still time to decide before the structural renovations are finished (facade and roof being the most important).