ILFC orders 20 787's

bits44 · Post by **bits44** » 17 Oct 2005, 07:17

This order brings the current announced orders to 293 to date.

http://www.investors.com/breakingnews.a ... 3368&brk=1

CX · Post by CX » 17 Oct 2005, 07:56

A350!!!

lastrow · Post by **lastrow** » 17 Oct 2005, 09:02

just a question: the article says that ILFC ordered 20 planes at a cost of USD 2.4bn. Later on, it says that each plane has a list price of USD 120mio - which is right away 2.4bn divided by 20, but ILFC got a discount. I am not a native English speaker (as some of you might have guessed

but does this article give the impression that ILFC has spent 2.4bn or not?
-lr.

bits44 · Post by **bits44** » 17 Oct 2005, 13:51

No, you will never see what any customer actually paid for any Aircraft, thats a bigger secret than a womans age. they will have paid substantially less than the list price.

KT

boeing797 · Post by **boeing797** » 17 Oct 2005, 14:49

CX wrote:A350!!!

Why not A350? Is it because they figure out their customers will favour B787? Anybody knows?

Thanks!

Ciao

waldova · Post by **waldova** » 17 Oct 2005, 16:10

Does anybody know to which airlines these planes will be leased to in the future?

Knight255 · Post by **Knight255** » 17 Oct 2005, 18:18

thats a bigger secret than a womans age

So true!!!!

About the A350, I'm sure ILFC will order some of those too in the future. They need to respect their customers needs. Some prefer the 787 over the A350 and vice versa.

bigjulie · Post by **bigjulie** » 22 Oct 2005, 20:31

ILFC seem to be the biggest a/c leasing company about; don't :shoot: me if I am wrong, it is just my opinion

HorsePower · Post by **HorsePower** » 22 Oct 2005, 20:37

bigjulie wrote:ILFC seem to be the biggest a/c leasing company about

AFAIK, this is correct! Also ILFC is Boeing's biggest single customer.

Concerning the order, it is not impossible that the order belongs to QF.

Regards

Seb.

bigjulie · Post by **bigjulie** » 23 Oct 2005, 00:12

So I'm not getting :shoot: ?

bigjulie · Post by **bigjulie** » 29 Oct 2005, 23:14

bigjulie wrote: So I'm not getting :shoot:?

That's good