Contrail spotting

Planespotting in the upper atmosphere! All pictures, reports or whatever question about upper level traffic come here

Moderator: Plane spotting team

Locked
Air_Defence
Posts: 16
Joined: 26 Jan 2005, 00:00

Post by Air_Defence »

Today sunny weather in Belgium

An E-3A from NATO based at Geilinkirchen during an operational patrol

Image


Grtzz Dirk
BTW happy new year to all of you! :wink:
Last edited by Air_Defence on 06 Jan 2006, 11:19, edited 1 time in total.

Air_Defence
Posts: 16
Joined: 26 Jan 2005, 00:00

Post by Air_Defence »

Image

A BAF F-16 high level

Grtzz Dirk
www.voortmansdirk.be
Last edited by Air_Defence on 06 Jan 2006, 11:20, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Skystef
Posts: 1996
Joined: 13 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Near 25R/EBBR
Contact:

Post by Skystef »

Inderdeed, Dirk some nice weather on January 4, but please continue in English.

Here a small grip:

1419: very recognizable bird of Martinair: PH-MCU full of roses heading SE.
Image


1205: another MD11 of Martinair, the presence of windows (+ACAR) identified it as PH-MCP heading SE.
Image


1604: Lauda Air B767-300 OE-LAX cruising W wards.
Image

1610: a late evening shot of Biman A310-300, heading for the UK.
Image

User avatar
contrailwatcherUK
Posts: 501
Joined: 31 Aug 2005, 00:00
Location: dorset, england

Post by contrailwatcherUK »

nice photos. i often see martinair over my house

Kapitein
Posts: 1695
Joined: 29 Jul 2004, 00:00
Location: Somewhere around the globe....
Contact:

Post by Kapitein »

Taken on 04/01 and 06/01

A330 LTU
Image

Das Air Cargo, 5X-BON, heading to BRU flying for ET
Image

LH A340-300
Image

And 6 minutes after PH-MCP crossed Skystef it came above Landen heading SE
Image

UA 777-200 coming from Germany heading to the States
Image

And if someone can help me with this one (04/01). Heading to the East.
Image

pipodeclown
Posts: 19
Joined: 08 Jan 2006, 00:00

Post by pipodeclown »

Brubiac,

IMO last one is A340-500 9V-SG_ operating as SQ021 JFK-SIN.

When was it taken?

Pipodeclown

pipodeclown
Posts: 19
Joined: 08 Jan 2006, 00:00

Post by pipodeclown »

People,

SQ021 is EWR-SIN :-)

Pipodeclown

Kapitein
Posts: 1695
Joined: 29 Jul 2004, 00:00
Location: Somewhere around the globe....
Contact:

Post by Kapitein »

Thanks Pipodeclown,

that was also my first idea. I always taught they flew in the other direction back to EWR.
Photo was taken on 04/01 around noon.

A little suggestion: please use the "Edit" button when you want to corrected your previous post, thanks

elnombre
Posts: 327
Joined: 06 May 2003, 00:00
Location: Wezembeek-Oppem

Post by elnombre »

Gentlemen
I was intrigued by this shot as the SIA A345 usually flies to the north of our country, however I can confirm that on the 4th Jan SIA021 crossed KOK@1038 and REMBA@1050 UTC (+1 For Local)
Aircraft reg: 9V-SGA
Today she's going north again via Danish airspace
Best Regards
Elnombre

pipodeclown
Posts: 19
Joined: 08 Jan 2006, 00:00

Post by pipodeclown »

Elnombre,

I saw SQ021 passing overhead EHAM inbound ARNEM last Monday or Tuesday.

What is its normal routing overhead Danmark?

Pipodeclown

User avatar
Sabena_690
Posts: 3378
Joined: 20 Sep 2002, 00:00

Post by Sabena_690 »

Very interesting shot of the SIA A345! I haven't spotted an overflying SQ A345 yet...

About two weeks ago, I spotted the EK201 DXB-JFK flying into the direction of KOK, a first as well for me.

By the way: http://www.antonakis.co.uk/acars.php?page=request is an excellent resource to tie up registrations if you have the flight number.

A pity that there are so many clouds today, as TC-JNB (TK's latest A332) was due LHR this morning.

@Skystef: I saw OE-LAX as well on 04JAN, it was routing VIE-VRA-HOG.

Regards
Frederic
Brussels Airlines - Flying Your Way

pipodeclown
Posts: 19
Joined: 08 Jan 2006, 00:00

Post by pipodeclown »

Sabena_690,

EK201 DXB-JFK was most likely flying inbound COA. KOK is used for eastbound traffic.

Pipodeclown

User avatar
Sabena_690
Posts: 3378
Joined: 20 Sep 2002, 00:00

Post by Sabena_690 »

Hi pipodeclown,

That's very well possible; I only mentioned KOK to give everybody an idea of the direction of the aircraft.

You seem to know a lot of waypoints etc, do you know where I can find a list of those in and surrounding Belgium (perhaps with a map)?

Thanks
Frederic
Brussels Airlines - Flying Your Way

Air_Defence
Posts: 16
Joined: 26 Jan 2005, 00:00

Post by Air_Defence »

Hi,

today only 1 military plane during my spotting period.
This C-17 from McChord AFB is onroute to Ramstein AB.

Image


Grtzz Dirk

Ivan_Eagle
Posts: 190
Joined: 16 Apr 2005, 00:00
Location: Mechelen, Hombeek

Post by Ivan_Eagle »

Very nice pictures of you all!!
I just do contrailspotting whit my binocular (verrekijker :wink: ).
I saw some many big baby's :P 8)

Greats Ivan

User avatar
Skystef
Posts: 1996
Joined: 13 Apr 2003, 00:00
Location: Near 25R/EBBR
Contact:

Post by Skystef »

Thx for info Fred, concerning OE-LAX.

Saw a couple of times the SIA A340-500 cruising E, has perhaps something to do with the position of the jetstream.
I even made a photo of this Airbus on October 20 2005, also 9V-SGA en route EWR-SIA.
In general I dislike pictures with opposite light, so do not make lots of efforts picturing the planes cruising towards the East, unless the contrail self or airplane is of interest.

Image


The best shots are with backlight and in my area they are planes cruising to the WNW.
Especially with the Emirates, practise is possible as more than a dozen are passing.
How close can U get? Perhaps this close, taken on January 8 around 1200LT.
Image

A few minutes earlier a Cargolux with a contrail is special to me as usually to low to see damp.
Image

moons

Post by moons »

Hi,

The F 16 picture...
I'm a bit surprised. :? I thought that the engines of fighter jets were to " light " to cause contrails? I read this in the book " Jongens en Wetenschap ". Or is this a lying book? :)

Greets and nice pic's by the way !

Air_Defence
Posts: 16
Joined: 26 Jan 2005, 00:00

Post by Air_Defence »

Hi ,

Fighter aircraft like the F-16 can make contrails!
I'm an air defence controller in the BAF and last week a pilot told me during the debriefing that the F-16s were having conrails as from FL200, (this depends from day to day)

When I did my backseat, I took this schot when we passed 2 other F-16s during a CAP mission (combat air patrol) They were having contrail as well http://www.voortmansdirk.be/fotosvd/contrails.jpg

Most of the time the fighters try to stay below the contrail level because this is not very tactical, you can see other jets with contrails from over 30NM when you are in the sky... And as a fighter you don't want to be seen.

Grtzz Dirk
www.voortmansdirk.be

User avatar
Bruspotter
Posts: 2068
Joined: 04 Sep 2004, 00:00
Location: (Antwerp/Belgium)
Contact:

Post by Bruspotter »

Hello

Nice pictures again guys!!

Really cool the SQ 345 , I would guess SQ operates the SIN-EWR route over the Pacific via LAX :? Isn't that less far? Anyway , I'd really like to see THAT one , but I'm not on the good location I'm afraid :(.

Did saw another ANA All Nippon Airways B747-400 enrouting NRT-CDG. But it's only the usual traffic.

Looking forward to the next bright day.

Best regards: Yannick

pipodeclown
Posts: 19
Joined: 08 Jan 2006, 00:00

Post by pipodeclown »

Guys, girls,

SIN-EWR SQ 22 is most likely flown over the pacific.
EWR-SIN SQ21 is most likely flown over the atlantic.

I've never seen reports SQ22 flying overhead Europe. SQ21 is normally flying higher North than Belgium.

Flying Eastward means full advantage of the jetstream. This is far more important than choosing the shortest distance. Following the jetstream means that the actual flown distance decreases. If you fly Westbound(against the jet), your actual distance will increase.

Depending on the position of the stream, the routing is chosen. Be aware that many factors come into play when choosing the optimal routing for a long flight! This can save huge amounts of fuel (=money)!!

Bruspotter: You can see it passing from Oevel, just look at the contrails South of you! It might be difficult with the backlight, of course!

Mind your English: I always see you writing: 'did saw'. It is 'did see'! Did + "present infinitive"

Pipodeclown

Locked