Jet Airways rumours

Air Key West · Post by **Air Key West** » 09 Sep 2007, 19:56

I agree.

Stij · Post by **Stij** » 10 Sep 2007, 08:24

K_R wrote:As far as I am always told, only the satelite is a protected monument. I'm not sure, but I think even the bridges can't be broken down. Of course, this makes it ideal for low coast carriers, who don't use bridges anyway. About these bridges, I have walked true one recently. The last part of them, which connects to the planes, really gave me a Star Wars feeling

The old terminalbuilding is not protected. The major problem is that this building is full of asbest and by that reason very expensive to renovate. The BAC will only commence on renovating it if they are certain they will profit of it, so adding a special JA-concourse and a low cost concourse will do the job, I guess.

The old terminalbuilding is, honestly, ugly and dirtiy, it gives me a Eastern Europe feeling.

I thought it was the other way around: the terminal protected, but not the satelite...

Kind regards,

Stij

Ducatibiker · Post by **Ducatibiker** » 10 Sep 2007, 08:38

As the world goes flat, it is time to think of the airport of the next generation. Maybe a good subject for a separate thread.I would definitively flatten this old 1958 terminal and replace by a new 'pole'.

capetown · Post by **capetown** » 22 Oct 2007, 13:11

Apparently, JET is doing very well - and wants to double its 1 mio pax/year target at BRU...

Have a look at the link (Dutch only)
http://www.standaard.be/Artikel/Detail. ... 102007_028

dre · Post by **dre** » 22 Oct 2007, 13:38

Good for BRU

Will they employ now some belgian pilots or CC?