London City Airport can fill London airport capacity gap

Share

Use of existing capacity at London City Airport (LCY) will help meet the air connectivity needs of London and the UK in the period between the Government’s response to the Airports Commission and the completion of any new infrastructure.

LCY has an existing permission to increase flights from 75,000 today to 120,000, injecting another 45,000 valuable aircraft movements into an already-constrained system, to the benefit of London’s businesses, its employment prospects and the wider UK economy as a whole. Using this existing capacity has, however, been delayed by the Mayor of London who has directed refusal of planning permission for extra aircraft stands at London City Airport.

The ability to fully utilise existing capacity at London City Airport also depends on the willingness of Government to uphold the airport’s appeal against the Mayor of London’s ruling.

Declan Collier, Chief Executive Officer, London City Airport, believes the opportunity to deliver extra capacity into the London airport system in the short term is too great – and too greatly needed – to be hamstrung by one person:

“London City Airport recognises that any new runway in the South East is unlikely to be delivered until the late 2020s, and believes that better use of existing airport capacity must be made in the interim period.

“We already have permission to increase flight movements – we simply require a permission to expand the airport’s existing infrastructure in order to inject much-needed capacity into the London system pending the delivery of any new runway favoured by the Government. Extra capacity could be in operation at LCY within 18 months.

“Airports bring immense benefits – to the communities in which they operate, through employment, education, training and community relations, and to the wider economy – as well as facilitating national and international trade and providing businesses with the opportunity to develop and invest.

“It would be a travesty if London and the UK were not allowed to make the best use of airport capacity in the short term, as well as in the medium and long terms.”

01/07/2015

This post was published on 4 July 2015 16:37

André Orban

M. Sc. Engineering

Published by
André Orban

Recent Posts

Romanian airline Dan Air files for insolvency amid €10 million environmental debt

Romanian carrier seeks protection from creditors as total liabilities reach €25.4 million; flight operations face…

23 October 2026

Jetstar bans passenger after he inflates life jacket during safety demonstration

Jetstar and Qantas have banned an Australian social media personality from flying with their airlines…

23 October 2026

Flemish Government suspends new Brussels Airport flight plan over noise concerns

The Flemish Government has invoked a conflict of interest against the proposed changes to flight…

23 October 2026

Brussels Airport to expand border controls as EES delays persist, government registration kiosks remain offline

Brussels Airport will add eight manual border-control positions for arriving passengers by the end of…

23 October 2026

Typhoon Champi forces cancellation of more than 600 flights in Taiwan

Typhoon Champi has disrupted air travel across Taiwan, forcing the cancellation of more than 600…

23 October 2026

Copenhagen Airport faces major security queues after new screening requirements

Copenhagen Airport (CPH) is experiencing major queues at security screening after new requirements introduced by…

23 October 2026