Trade unions are voicing growing concern over possible restructuring at Antwerp (Deurne) Airport and Ostend-Bruges Airport after internal documents linked to airport operator Egis surfaced, suggesting scenarios that could lead to staff reductions at both regional airports.
According to the socialist union ACOD/CGSP, up to 37 full-time equivalent positions—around a quarter of the workforce—could be at risk at Antwerp Airport, with an additional 22 FTEs potentially affected at Ostend. The documents reportedly outline efficiency measures, including greater centralisation of operations between the two airports, and appear to anticipate a scenario in which key airline activity could decline.
The concerns come despite recent positive developments. Antwerp Airport recorded a positive operating result last year for the first time in many years, although it remains financially fragile and heavily dependent on TUI, which operates the vast majority of scheduled passenger flights from Deurne. TUI has already reduced its Antwerp programme for the upcoming summer season, increasing uncertainty about the airport’s medium-term outlook. Ostend-Bruges Airport, while also affected, benefits from larger aircraft capability and a stronger cargo operation, offering a more diversified activity base.
Union secretary-general Jan Van Wesemael criticised the way the documents came to light and demanded full transparency from management. He stressed that any plans affecting staff must be submitted to unions before decisions are taken. “Restructuring cannot be done quietly and after the deed. Public infrastructure cannot be managed as if it were a mere commercial enterprise,” he said. The unions also highlighted concerns about the airports’ mixed staffing model, as both facilities are owned by the Flemish government and employ a combination of civil servants and private-sector workers.
Operator denies decisions, calls documents preparatory
Airport operator Egis, a French mobility and infrastructure group, acknowledged the existence of the documents but said they were draft, internal working papers prepared for discussion and do not constitute an approved restructuring plan. According to the airport management, no decisions have been taken, and there is no intention of collective redundancies at either Antwerp or Ostend.
Spokesperson Tom Rutsaert said the documents were accessed without authorisation and began circulating prematurely, prompting concern among staff. Management has since contacted the unions and requested consultations to provide context and explanations, emphasising that clear and open communication remains a priority.
At the time of publication, the regional airports had not issued a further public response. The situation underscores the structural vulnerability of small regional airports, particularly those reliant on limited passenger traffic, and highlights tensions between commercial efficiency and public-sector responsibilities as discussions about the future of Antwerp and Ostend airports continue.