Norwegian

Norwegian disagrees with fine imposed by Norway on climate quotas and takes the State to court

Share

Norwegian sues the state – refuses to pay NOK 400 million fine

The airline has announced legal action to avoid a climate charge of NOK 400 million (approximately €40 million). Norwegian has now submitted the lawsuit to the district court.

In the summons to the Oslo District Court dated 9 January 2023, it is stated that Norwegian is suing the state at the Ministry of Climate and Environment.

The case concerns decisions on infringement fees under the Climate Quota Act. The District Court confirms that it has received the case.

The Ministry of Climate and Environment decided in December last year that Norwegian must pay an infringement fee of NOK 400 million for failure to deliver climate quotas in 2020.

Norwegian believes the ministry’s decision is invalid.

The company has set aside NOK 15 million for the fee, the quarterly report for the period July-September shows. Norwegian expected that a complaint would be upheld, but instead, the ministry upheld the decision.

The report for last year’s fourth quarter is scheduled to be presented on 16 February.

Norwegian’s comments on the submission on climate quotas:

We disagree and are very disappointed that we are being imposed a sky-high fee by the Norwegian state while in reality, we followed Norwegian law. There was a clear prerequisite in the reconstruction not to treat claims and creditors differently. Had we nevertheless paid the entire quota obligation, it could have entailed criminal liability, the Norwegian reconstructor was quite clear about that. Regrettably, we now have to go through the legal system to get a final clarification and have now found ourselves obliged to submit a summons, something we would very much like to have done without.

We do not disagree that we had a quota obligation, but it was – like all other demands in the reconstruction – 5 per cent of the amount we owed, not the full amount. This applied to all claims and creditors – including many small private suppliers, who unfortunately faced greater challenges than state actors.

It is also mind-boggling that the Norwegian authorities demand this from us and even impose a penalty fee of NOK 400 million, while the same issue was no problem in the EU country Ireland, where we were in a similar reconstruction. Here, the environmental authorities chose to respect the reconstruction. As is well known, the EU ETS is an EU regime, not a special Norwegian arrangement.”

This post was published on 22 January 2023 22:20

André Orban

M. Sc. Engineering

Published by
André Orban

Recent Posts

Emirates marks World Pilots’ Day with plan to hire 1,500 aviators

Emirates has announced plans to recruit more than 1,500 pilots over the next two years,…

1 May 2025

China Southern Airlines to resume direct Perth–Guangzhou flights from November 2025

Perth Airport has announced the return of China Southern Airlines' seasonal direct flights between Perth…

1 May 2025

Eindhoven Airport expands use of lifting aids to ease baggage handlers’ workload

Eindhoven Airport has added seven new lifting aids in its baggage hall, bringing the total…

1 May 2025

Dubai Airport welcomes 23.4 million guests in Q1 2025, sets new monthly record

Dubai International Airport (DXB) saw a strong start to 2025, welcoming 23.4 million passengers in…

1 May 2025

Finnair cancels 140 flights on May 2 due to industrial action, affecting 12,000 passengers

Finnair announced it will cancel approximately 140 flights on Friday, May 2, due to a…

30 April 2025

Greece orders 8 Airbus H215 helicopters to strengthen wildfire response

Athens has signed a deal with Airbus Helicopters for eight H215 helicopters, with options for…

30 April 2025